Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Directs GST Council to Implement Digital Document Identification System: Pradeep Goyal vs. Union of India (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 279A, Document Identification Number (DIN) System, Goods and Services Tax, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Directs GST Council to Implement Digital Document Identification System: Pradeep Goyal vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the GST Council should recommend the implementation of a Document Identification Number (DIN) system for all state tax communications. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation related to Tax Administration. Case Name: Pradeep Goyal vs. Union […]

Supreme Court Directs GST Council to Implement Digital Document Identification System: Pradeep Goyal vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Wife’s Convenience: N.C.V. Aishwarya vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Section 24, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 9, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Wife’s Convenience: N.C.V. Aishwarya vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings based on convenience and economic dependence. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Law Case Name: N.C.V. Aishwarya vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha [Judgment Date]: July 18, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 18, 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Wife’s Convenience: N.C.V. Aishwarya vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982, Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 with Rule 12, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 with Regulation 173

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a military personnel is entitled to disability pension for an injury sustained during leave, not directly related to military service. CASE TYPE: Armed Forces Tribunal, Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “pre-existing dispute” under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: M/S S.S. Engineers vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2022)

/ CIRP, Indira Banerjee, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 8, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9, Judges, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Pre-Existing Dispute Under IBC: M/S S.S. Engineers vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a pre-existing dispute between an operational creditor and a corporate debtor bars the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). CASE TYPE: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Case Name: M/S S.S. Engineers vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “pre-existing dispute” under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: M/S S.S. Engineers vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Child Custody Dispute: Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 17, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 13, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 6, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA in Custody Battle LEGAL ISSUE: International Child Custody and Habeas Corpus CASE TYPE: Family Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: Rajeswari Chandrasekar Ganesh vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. Judgment Date: 14 July 2022 Date of the Judgment: 14 July 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source]

Child Custody Dispute: Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Anticipatory Bail Hearings: Subrata Roy Sahara vs. Pramod Kumar Saini (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Anticipatory Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Anticipatory Bail Hearings: Subrata Roy Sahara vs. Pramod Kumar Saini (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of inquiry in anticipatory bail applications. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Subrata Roy Sahara vs. Pramod Kumar Saini & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 July 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 July 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Anticipatory Bail Hearings: Subrata Roy Sahara vs. Pramod Kumar Saini (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Oral Dying Declaration: Kamal Khudal vs. State of Assam (2022)

/ Dying Declaration, Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Oral Dying Declaration: Kamal Khudal vs. State of Assam (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an oral dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kamal Khudal vs. State of Assam Judgment Date: 14 July 2022 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Oral Dying Declaration: Kamal Khudal vs. State of Assam (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Discharge Rules for Assam Rifles Personnel: Amarendra Kumar Pandey vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Reasoned Orders, Disciplinary Proceedings, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Judicial Review, Service Law, Service Law with Assam Rifles Act, 1941, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Discharge Rules for Assam Rifles Personnel: Amarendra Kumar Pandey vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether discharge from service is mandatory for Assam Rifles personnel upon receiving four Red Ink entries. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Armed Forces). Case Name: Amarendra Kumar Pandey vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: July

Supreme Court Clarifies Discharge Rules for Assam Rifles Personnel: Amarendra Kumar Pandey vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Shahaja vs. State of Maharashtra (2022)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 8, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Shahaja vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in upholding a murder conviction based on eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Shahaja @ Shahajan Ismail Mohd. Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra [Judgment Date]: 14 July 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony: Shahaja vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 195, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 340, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 191, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 192, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 211, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the investigation of alleged killings of tribals in Chhattisgarh should be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Petition Case Name: Himanshu Kumar and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders

/ Company Appeal, Corporate Law, Judges, NCLAT, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit, Withdrawal of Appeals

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders LEGAL ISSUE: Withdrawal of appeals based on the final order passed by the appellate tribunal. CASE TYPE: Corporate Law, specifically concerning appeals against orders of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). Case Name: L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeals in Multiple Cases Related to NCLAT Orders Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns NCDRC order in Marine Insurance Claim: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shashikala J. Ayachi (2022)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Consumer Law with Regulation 9, Deficiency in Service, Hemant Gupta, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Regulation 9, Judges, Marine Insurance, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court overturns NCDRC order in Marine Insurance Claim: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shashikala J. Ayachi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was correct in allowing a claim for a sunken vessel based on the evidence provided. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Marine Insurance Case Name: M/s The New

Supreme Court overturns NCDRC order in Marine Insurance Claim: New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shashikala J. Ayachi (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top