Supreme Court quashes High Court order mandating ID proofs for OLX ads: OLX India B.V. vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can issue interim directions to an online platform to collect ID proofs from advertisers without hearing the platform. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: OLX India B.V. vs. State […]
Supreme Court clarifies promotion rights for voluntary retirees and delays: Union of India vs. Manpreet Singh Poonam (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a voluntary retiree can claim promotion as a matter of right and whether a delay in considering promotion creates a vested right over a post. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India
Supreme Court Upholds MACP Implementation Date, Rejects ACP Claims: DDA vs. Narender Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) should be applied from 01-01-2006, or 01-09-2008 and whether employees are entitled to benefits under the old Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme after the implementation of MACP. CASE TYPE: Service Law
Supreme Court to Revisit Driving Licence Rules for Light Motor Vehicles and Transport Vehicles LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person holding a driving licence for a “light motor vehicle” is also authorized to drive a “transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class” without a specific endorsement on the licence. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicles Law Case Name:
Supreme Court quashes contempt order for non-compliance of order passed without hearing: State of Odisha vs. Samal Barrage Employees’ Union (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 192 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a contempt order be issued for non-compliance of an order passed without
Supreme Court Sets Aside Contempt Order: Abhyudaya Kumar Shahi vs. Bharat Pradhan Filling Centre (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct an appeal to be decided by a forum that is no longer in existence due to changes in guidelines. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal, Contempt of Court Case Name: Sri Abhyudaya Kumar Shahi
Supreme Court Restores Interim Injunction in Film Rights Dispute: Narendra Hirawat & Co. vs. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appellate court should interfere with a trial court’s order granting an interim injunction when the trial court’s decision was reasonable and judicially sound. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Intellectual Property Rights Case
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rape Case: Abhishek Kumar vs. State of Delhi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Grant of Anticipatory Bail in cases of alleged rape. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Abhishek Kumar vs. State of Delhi [Judgment Date]: March 07, 2022 Date of the Judgment: March 07, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 203 Judges:
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Forgery Case: Jarnail Singh vs. State of Punjab (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Grant of Anticipatory Bail in cases of forgery and cheating. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Jarnail Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. Judgment Date: 07 March 2022 Date of the Judgment: 07 March 2022 Citation: (2022)
Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in Murder Case: M. Nageswara Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in overturning the trial court’s conviction of the accused in a murder case based on minor inconsistencies and the status of witnesses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: M. Nageswara Reddy vs. The
Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of NGT on land use change: Raza Ahmad vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has the jurisdiction to hear a challenge to a change in land use notification when it allegedly violates the conditions of an Environmental Clearance (EC). CASE TYPE: Environmental Law Case
Supreme Court Abates Appeal After Convict’s Death: Yeruva Sayireddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: 07 March 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose Can an appeal against a conviction continue after the death of the appellant? The Supreme Court
