Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection for Potato Spoilage: Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage vs. New India Assurance (2022)

/ Consumer Law, Contract Law, Deterioration of Stock Policy, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dinesh Maheshwari, Exclusion Clauses, Insurance Claims, Insurance Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Terms of Contract

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection for Potato Spoilage: Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage vs. New India Assurance (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of exception clauses in insurance policies related to temperature control in cold storage facilities. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Insurance Law Case Name: M/s Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage & Anr vs. New India […]

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection for Potato Spoilage: Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage vs. New India Assurance (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection in Cold Storage Deterioration Case: Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage vs. New India Assurance Company (24 January 2022)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Deterioration of Stock Policy, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dinesh Maheshwari, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Exception Clause, Judges, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), Policy Exceptions

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection in Cold Storage Deterioration Case Date of the Judgment: 24 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No 2371 of 2019 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can an insurance company reject a claim for damaged goods if the insured fails to adhere to the policy’s temperature

Supreme Court Upholds Insurance Claim Rejection in Cold Storage Deterioration Case: Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage vs. New India Assurance Company (24 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Interest on Compensation for Injured Laborer: Ajaya Kumar Das vs. Divisional Manager (2022)

/ Compensation Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Insurance Law, Judges, Motor Insurance, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 4A

Supreme Court Restores Interest on Compensation for Injured Laborer: Ajaya Kumar Das vs. Divisional Manager (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether interest on compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 should be paid from the date of the accident or the date of adjudication. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Workmen Compensation Case Name: Ajaya Kumar Das & Anr. vs.

Supreme Court Restores Interest on Compensation for Injured Laborer: Ajaya Kumar Das vs. Divisional Manager (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022)

/ Apartment Buyers Agreement, Bela M. Trivedi, Breach of contract, Consumer, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(d), Contract Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the commencement date for calculating the period for handing over possession of an apartment in a housing project. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: M/s IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand and Others Judgment Date: 21

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Case: Shivdhar Kumar Vashiya vs. Ranjeet Singh (2022)

/ Compensation for Motor Accidents, Judges, Loss of Amenities, M.R. Shah, Motor Accident Law, Pain and Suffering, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Case: Shivdhar Kumar Vashiya vs. Ranjeet Singh (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 21, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can the compensation awarded for pain, suffering and loss of amenities in a motor accident case be enhanced when

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Case: Shivdhar Kumar Vashiya vs. Ranjeet Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022) INSC 43

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21(b), Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case Date of the Judgment: 21 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 43 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J., Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can a bank be held liable for crediting funds to the wrong account due to its own error? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022) INSC 43 Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Bigamy Complaint Based on Family Court Ruling: Musstt Rehana Begum vs. State of Assam (21 January 2022)

/ Bela M Trivedi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Family Courts Act, 1984, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 7, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 495, Inherent Powers of High Court, Judges, Jurisdiction of Family Court, Offences Relating to Marriage

Supreme Court Quashes Bigamy Complaint Based on Family Court Ruling Date of the Judgment: 21 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 54 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Bela M Trivedi, J Can a criminal complaint for bigamy stand when a Family Court has already ruled that the alleged prior marriage did not exist? The

Supreme Court Quashes Bigamy Complaint Based on Family Court Ruling: Musstt Rehana Begum vs. State of Assam (21 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies tax exemptions for manufacturing units: State of Gujarat vs. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited (21 January 2022)

/ Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 with Section 45, Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 with Section 49(2), Judges, M.R. Shah, Purchase Tax, Sanjiv Khanna, Tax Exemptions, Tax Law

Supreme Court clarifies tax exemptions for manufacturing units: State of Gujarat vs. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a manufacturing unit is eligible for tax exemptions on raw materials when those materials are not directly used by the unit but transferred to another entity for processing. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case

Supreme Court clarifies tax exemptions for manufacturing units: State of Gujarat vs. Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited (21 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Environmental Case, Emphasizes NGT’s Adjudicatory Role: Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust vs. State of Gujarat (21 January 2022)

/ Bela M Trivedi, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 with Sections 3, 6 and 25, Environmental Adjudication, Environmental Law, Judges, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 14, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 with Section 15, Solid Waste Management

Supreme Court Restores Environmental Case, Emphasizes NGT’s Adjudicatory Role: Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust vs. State of Gujarat (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) can delegate its adjudicatory functions to an administrative expert committee. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law Case Name: Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust and Others vs.

Supreme Court Restores Environmental Case, Emphasizes NGT’s Adjudicatory Role: Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust vs. State of Gujarat (21 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022)

/ Apartment Buyers Agreement, Bela M Trivedi, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(d), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fire NOC, Judges, Real Estate Law

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the commencement date for calculating the period for handing over possession of an apartment in a housing project. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: M/s IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand and Others Judgment Date: 21

Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 41, Rule 27, Consumer Disputes Redressal, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Protection Act with Section 21(b), Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) can overturn orders of lower consumer forums based on a report obtained suo moto during the revision process. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: Sunil Kumar

Supreme Court Restores Consumer Forum Order in Bank Error Case: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Revisional Powers in Consumer Cases: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (21 January 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21(b), Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Revisional Jurisdiction, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Revisional Powers in Consumer Cases: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (2022) Date of the Judgment: 21 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 38 Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) call for a report from a party during the revision stage?

Supreme Court Clarifies Revisional Powers in Consumer Cases: Sunil Kumar Maity vs. State Bank of India (21 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top