Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (26 July 2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Regularization of Daily Wagers, Service Law, Service Law with Gujarat Agricultural University Judgement, Service Law with Umadevi Judgement

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether daily wagers are entitled to regularization of their services. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela and Anr. Judgment Date: 26 July 2021 Date of the Judgment: 26 July […]

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (26 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in murder case: Pruthiviraj Jayantibhai Vanol vs. Dinesh Dayabhai Vala (2021)

/ Bombay Police Act, Bombay Police Act with Section 135(1), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Navin Sinha, Offences Against Human Body, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in murder case: Pruthiviraj Jayantibhai Vanol vs. Dinesh Dayabhai Vala (2021) Date of the Judgment: July 26, 2021 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 2014 Judges: Justice Navin Sinha and Justice R. Subhash Reddy Can a High Court reverse a Trial Court’s conviction based on a perceived inconsistency between eyewitness testimony

Supreme Court overturns acquittal in murder case: Pruthiviraj Jayantibhai Vanol vs. Dinesh Dayabhai Vala (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Minimum Marks Criteria for Sub-Inspector Promotions: Arvind Kumar Tiwari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 July 2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Promotion, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, Service Law with Uttar Pradesh Sub-Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service Rules, 2008

Supreme Court Upholds Minimum Marks Criteria for Sub-Inspector Promotions: Arvind Kumar Tiwari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates must obtain minimum qualifying marks in each subject of a promotional exam to be eligible for further evaluation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Arvind Kumar Tiwari & Ors. vs. The State of

Supreme Court Upholds Minimum Marks Criteria for Sub-Inspector Promotions: Arvind Kumar Tiwari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (26 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Infrastructure Fraud Case: M/s Supreme Bhiwandi Wada Manor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. (26 July 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 200, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 420, Judges, M R Shah, Offences Relating to Documents and Property

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Infrastructure Fraud Case Date of the Judgment: 26 July 2021 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 680 of 2021, @ SLP (Crl) No 3155 of 2018; Criminal Appeal No. 681 of 2021, @ SLP (Crl) No 3156 of 2018; Criminal Appeal No. 682 of 2021, @ SLP (Crl) No 2617

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Infrastructure Fraud Case: M/s Supreme Bhiwandi Wada Manor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. (26 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

/ Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), Civil Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Supreme Court Judgments, Telecom Law, Telecom Regulatory

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021)

/ Appeals, Divorce, Family Courts Act, 1984, Family Courts Act, 1984 with Section 19, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 29, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Special Marriage Act, 1954, Special Marriage Act, 1954 with Section 39, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the delay in filing an appeal from a decree passed by a Family Court under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. CASE

Supreme Court Clarifies Condonation of Delay in Divorce Appeals Under Special Marriage Act: Arunoday Singh vs. Lee Anne Elton (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employment Law, Employment Law with Section 617 of the erstwhile Companies Act 1956, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 3(m), M.R. Shah, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Rehabilitation Schemes

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person is entitled to employment based on land acquired, when the land holding is computed by including land of relatives. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Limited vs. Anadinath Banerjee [Judgment Date]: 23 July

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition for employment: Eastern Coalfields vs. Anadinath Banerjee (2021) Read Post »

Compounding of Offences Under SEBI Act: Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of SEBI in Prakash Gupta vs. SEBI (23 July 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Compounding of Offences, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, M R Shah, Offences and Penalties, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 with Section 11B, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 with Section 24A

Supreme Court Clarifies Compounding of SEBI Act Offences: Prakash Gupta vs. SEBI (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) or a court can compound an offense under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (“SEBI Act”) without the consent of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). CASE TYPE: Securities

Compounding of Offences Under SEBI Act: Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of SEBI in Prakash Gupta vs. SEBI (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Formation in Tender Cases: South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. M/s. S. Kumar’s Associates (2021)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Formation of Contract, Hemant Gupta, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 7, Judges, Letter of Intent, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Formation in Tender Cases: South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. M/s. S. Kumar’s Associates (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract is formed when a Letter of Intent (LoI) is issued and some preliminary steps are taken, but the formal contract is not executed and the required security deposit and integrity pact are

Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Formation in Tender Cases: South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. M/s. S. Kumar’s Associates (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 197 CrPC for public servants in forgery case: Indra Devi vs. State of Rajasthan (23 July 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 197, Criminal Procedure, Hemant Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Clarifies Protection for Public Servants Under Section 197 CrPC in Forgery Case: Indra Devi vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a public servant is entitled to protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for actions related to forgery and fraud during their official duties. CASE TYPE: Criminal

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 197 CrPC for public servants in forgery case: Indra Devi vs. State of Rajasthan (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Convicted Murderer Implicated in Another Murder While on Bail: Somesh Chaurasia vs. State of M.P. (2021) INSC 408

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 319, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 389, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 50, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Convicted Murderer Implicated in Another Murder While on Bail: Somesh Chaurasia vs. State of M.P. (2021) INSC 408 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail granted to a convicted person can be cancelled if they are implicated in another serious offense while on bail. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Somesh Chaurasia vs.

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Convicted Murderer Implicated in Another Murder While on Bail: Somesh Chaurasia vs. State of M.P. (2021) INSC 408 Read Post »

Rights of Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court clarifies on interest for delayed possession in housing projects (22 July 2021)

/ Consumer Law, Consumer Law with Section 2(d), Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Hemant Gupta, Housing Projects, Judges, Real Estate Law, Real Estate Regulatory Authority Act, 2019, Rights of Subsequent Purchasers, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court on Rights of Subsequent Purchasers in Delayed Housing Projects Date of the Judgment: 22 July 2021 Citation: M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. vs CHARANJEET SINGH, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7042 of 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Hemant Gupta, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. (authored the judgment). Can a subsequent purchaser of a flat

Rights of Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court clarifies on interest for delayed possession in housing projects (22 July 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top