Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court permits transportation of already mined iron ore: Chowgule and Company Private Limited vs. Goa Foundation & Ors. (2020) INSC 47

Supreme Court permits transportation of already mined iron ore: Chowgule and Company Private Limited vs. Goa Foundation & Ors. (2020) INSC 47 Date of the Judgment: January 30, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 47 Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant, JJ. Can mining leaseholders transport iron ore that was mined before a court-ordered […]

Supreme Court permits transportation of already mined iron ore: Chowgule and Company Private Limited vs. Goa Foundation & Ors. (2020) INSC 47 Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings arising from family dispute: Ahmad Ali Quraishi & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (30 January 2020)

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Family Dispute Case Date of the Judgment: 30 January 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 89 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J. and M.R. Shah, J. Can a criminal complaint be quashed if it appears to be a tool for settling personal scores rather than a genuine pursuit of justice? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings arising from family dispute: Ahmad Ali Quraishi & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (30 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020)

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a statement made by a counsel on behalf of a client, regarding re-induction of a tenant, is binding on the client. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control/Eviction). Case Name: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies parity in service termination cases: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs Ram Gopal (2020)

Supreme Court clarifies parity in service termination cases: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs Ram Gopal (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee, whose services were terminated due to irregularities in the initial selection process, is entitled to reinstatement based on parity with another employee who was initially terminated for the same reason but was later allowed

Supreme Court clarifies parity in service termination cases: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs Ram Gopal (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Mined Ore Post Dues Payment: State of Odisha vs. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (2020)

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Mined Ore Post Dues Payment: State of Odisha vs. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a buyer of already mined and processed iron ore can be restricted from transporting it from the seller’s lease area due to the seller’s lack of environmental clearance, despite the buyer having

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Mined Ore Post Dues Payment: State of Odisha vs. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Deputation and Absorption in NOIDA: Shripal Bhati vs. State of UP (29 January 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Deputation and Absorption in NOIDA: Shripal Bhati vs. State of UP (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appointment of an employee on deputation and subsequent absorption in the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) is valid under the NOIDA Service Regulations, 1981. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Shripal Bhati & Anr. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Deputation and Absorption in NOIDA: Shripal Bhati vs. State of UP (29 January 2020) Read Post »

Anticipatory Bail: Supreme Court Defines Scope and Duration Under Section 438 CrPC (29 January 2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope of Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC LEGAL ISSUE: Scope and duration of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [Judgment Date]: 29 January 2020 Introduction Date of

Anticipatory Bail: Supreme Court Defines Scope and Duration Under Section 438 CrPC (29 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Mukesh Kumar vs. Union of India (29 January 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Mukesh Kumar vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the President’s rejection of a mercy petition can be judicially reviewed and what are the grounds for such review. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law; Constitutional Law; Mercy Petition Case Name: Mukesh Kumar vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Mercy Petition in Nirbhaya Case: Mukesh Kumar vs. Union of India (29 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Amendment Transferring Labour Law Offenses to Criminal Courts: State of M.P. vs. M.P. Transport Workers Fedn. (29 January 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Amendment Transferring Labour Law Offenses to Criminal Courts: State of M.P. vs. M.P. Transport Workers Fedn. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the transfer of jurisdiction for trying offenses under labour laws from Labour Courts to regular criminal courts is constitutional. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Labour Law Case Name: State of M.P. & Anr.

Supreme Court Upholds Amendment Transferring Labour Law Offenses to Criminal Courts: State of M.P. vs. M.P. Transport Workers Fedn. (29 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Reservation for Public Use: Mohandas vs. State of Maharashtra (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Reservation for Public Use: Mohandas vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land reservation for a public purpose lapses if the land is not acquired within a specified time, and the effect of a revised development plan on such reservations. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition and Town Planning Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Reservation for Public Use: Mohandas vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) Read Post »

Airline Not Liable for ‘Gate No Show’ Passengers: Supreme Court Clarifies in Consumer Case (28 January 2020)

Airline Not Liable for ‘Gate No Show’ Passengers: Indigo Airlines vs. Kalpana Rani Debbarma (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an airline is liable for deficiency in service when a passenger fails to report at the boarding gate before its closure, resulting in them missing their flight. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: The Branch Manager, Indigo

Airline Not Liable for ‘Gate No Show’ Passengers: Supreme Court Clarifies in Consumer Case (28 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: Sujit Tiwari vs. State of Gujarat (2020)

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: Sujit Tiwari vs. State of Gujarat (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail can be granted to an accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) when there is a possibility of the accused not being guilty of the offense. CASE TYPE: Criminal Bail. Case Name:

Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: Sujit Tiwari vs. State of Gujarat (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top