Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds Time Limit for Input Tax Credit Claims Under Tamil Nadu VAT Act

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(g), Input Tax Credit, Judges, Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 with Section 19(11), Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 with Section 3(3)

Supreme Court Upholds Section 19(11) of Tamil Nadu VAT Act: Input Tax Credit Claims (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 12, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 967 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a registered dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, even if the claim […]

Supreme Court Upholds Time Limit for Input Tax Credit Claims Under Tamil Nadu VAT Act Read Post »

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Disposal of State Largesse, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 12, 2018 Citation: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society & Anr. vs. Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 7608 of 2009, (2018) INSC 944 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.,

Supreme Court on Fair Consideration in State Largesse Disposal: Powai Panchsheel Co-op Hsg. Society vs. MHADA (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Arson Case After Compensation: Surender Singh vs. State of Haryana (2018)

/ Compensation, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 429, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 436, Indira Banerjee, Judges, R. Banumathi, Sentencing

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Arson Case After Compensation: Surender Singh vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence for arson can be reduced based on subsequent compensation paid to the victim. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Surender Singh vs. The State of Haryana & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11 October 2018 Date of

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Arson Case After Compensation: Surender Singh vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of the Limitation Act to applications under Sections 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: B.K. Educational Services Private Limited vs. Parag Gupta and Associates (2018) INSC 908 (11 October 2018)

/ Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 408, Companies Act, 2013 with Section 433, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 238A, Navin Sinha, R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Act Applicability to IBC Proceedings Date of the Judgment: 11 October 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 908 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J. and Navin Sinha, J. Can a creditor initiate insolvency proceedings for a debt that is time-barred under the Limitation Act? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question, clarifying the

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of the Limitation Act to applications under Sections 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: B.K. Educational Services Private Limited vs. Parag Gupta and Associates (2018) INSC 908 (11 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence: Uppala Bixam vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2018) INSC 894 (11 October 2018)

/ Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Murder, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder Case Name: Uppala Bixam @ Bixmaiah vs. The State

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence: Uppala Bixam vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2018) INSC 894 (11 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Despite Dying Declarations: Mehboob & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Despite Dying Declarations: Mehboob & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the act of extinguishing fire by the accused mitigates their culpability for murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Mehboob & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Despite Dying Declarations: Mehboob & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Attempted Murder Case: Rakesh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018)

/ Arms Act, Arms Act with Section 25, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 325, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Attempted Murder Case: Rakesh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (attempt to murder) was justified and whether the sentence imposed was appropriate. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rakesh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana Judgment

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Attempted Murder Case: Rakesh & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sk. Khabir vs. State of West Bengal (2018)

/ Criminal Law, Evidence, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Murder, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sk. Khabir vs. State of West Bengal (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the accused for murder based on the testimony of related eye-witnesses and corroborated by medical evidence is valid. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Sk. Khabir vs. State of West Bengal [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Double Murder Case: Sk. Khabir vs. State of West Bengal (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Brother’s Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Raja vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Brother’s Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Raja vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2018 Citation: Not Available in the provided document Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a conviction for murder be upheld solely on circumstantial evidence and an extra-judicial confession? The

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Brother’s Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Raja vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs premature release in fratricide case: Suganlal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court directs premature release in fratricide case: Suganlal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 904 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a person convicted of murder be released prematurely after serving a long prison sentence? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court directs premature release in fratricide case: Suganlal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018)

/ Appeal, Civil Procedure, Condonation of Delay, Ex-parte Decree, Indira Banerjee, Injunction, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Property Law, R. Banumathi, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 910 Judges: R. Banumathi, J., Indira Banerjee, J. Can a party who was aware of court proceedings claim ignorance to justify a delay in filing an appeal? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delay Condonation in Property Dispute: Mohd. Sahid vs. Raziya Khanam (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellant was part of a criminal conspiracy to murder the deceased. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Judgment Date: 10 October 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Conspiracy Conviction in Murder Case: Bilal Hajar vs. State (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top