Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Worker Count in Factory Closure Case: National Kamgar Union vs. Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd. (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Worker Count in Factory Closure Case: National Kamgar Union vs. Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the applicability of Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, based on the number of workers employed. CASE TYPE: Industrial Dispute Case Name: National Kamgar Union vs. Kran […]

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Worker Count in Factory Closure Case: National Kamgar Union vs. Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies incorporation of arbitration clause by reference to standard terms: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Contracts: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a general reference to standard terms and conditions in a contract is sufficient to incorporate an arbitration clause. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/S. INOX WIND LTD. vs M/S THERMOCABLES LTD. Judgment Date: 05 January

Supreme Court clarifies incorporation of arbitration clause by reference to standard terms: Inox Wind Ltd. vs. Thermocables Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018) Date of the Judgment: January 5, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 12 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a High Court quash an entire FIR after partially quashing it? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds FIR, Rejects Quashing in Land Fraud Case: Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018)

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Slum Rehabilitation Authority can remove a developer for project delays and lack of 70% slum dweller consent. CASE TYPE: Slum Redevelopment Law Case Name: Susme Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Addresses Slum Redevelopment Delays: Susme Builders vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeal, Grants Time for Fresh Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Delhi Development Authority’s (DDA) appeal regarding land acquisition should be allowed. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 13th February 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13th February 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2690 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeal, Grants Time for Fresh Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Misuse of Residential Premises in Delhi: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 1066 (15 December 2017)

“`html Can a city be held hostage by its own citizens and officials? The Supreme Court of India, in a long-standing battle against illegal constructions and misuse of residential properties in Delhi, has once again intervened. This judgment addresses the persistent issue of commercial activities in residential areas, highlighting the failure of authorities to enforce

Supreme Court Addresses Misuse of Residential Premises in Delhi: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 1066 (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Uniform Consumer Protection Rules: State of UP vs. All UP Consumer Protection Bar Association (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring uniform rules and infrastructure for consumer protection forums across India. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to consumer protection. Case Name: State of UP through Principal Secretary & Ors. vs. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Association. Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Can the Supreme Court direct the central government to create

Supreme Court Directs Uniform Consumer Protection Rules: State of UP vs. All UP Consumer Protection Bar Association (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the need for legislative backing for water charges: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can demand payment for water usage without explicit legal authorization. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Water Rights and Government Fees Case Name: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. & Another vs. State of Bihar & Others [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2017 Can a state government demand payment for water used

Supreme Court clarifies the need for legislative backing for water charges: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates accessibility for disabled persons in public spaces: Rajive Raturi vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 1087 (15 December 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring accessibility for persons with disabilities in public spaces and transport. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning disability rights. Case Name: Rajive Raturi vs. Union of India and Others. [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2017. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1087 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok

Supreme Court mandates accessibility for disabled persons in public spaces: Rajive Raturi vs. Union of India (2017) INSC 1087 (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs 5% Reservation and Accessibility for Disabled Students in Higher Education: Disabled Rights Group & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2017) INSC 1078 (15 December 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1078 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. Can educational institutions deny admission to students with disabilities? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical issue in a public interest litigation, emphasizing the rights of persons with disabilities to access education. The Court mandated a

Supreme Court Directs 5% Reservation and Accessibility for Disabled Students in Higher Education: Disabled Rights Group & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2017) INSC 1078 (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs fresh inquiry on temple’s public status: Vijendra Kumar vs. Commissioner, A.P. Charitable Institutions (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a temple is a private place of worship or a public shrine. CASE TYPE: Religious and Charitable Endowments Law Case Name: Vijendra Kumar & Ors. vs. The Commissioner, A.P. Charitable & Religious Institutions & Endowment Department & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation: 2017

Supreme Court directs fresh inquiry on temple’s public status: Vijendra Kumar vs. Commissioner, A.P. Charitable Institutions (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Petrol Pump Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Shashi Prabha Shukla (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct a fresh dealership to be awarded to an individual whose original dealership was cancelled due to irregularities. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. vs. Shashi Prabha Shukla & Anr. Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Petrol Pump Dealership: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Shashi Prabha Shukla (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top