Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Land Dispute: Harpal Singh vs. Ashok Kumar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court has jurisdiction over a land dispute when the land’s agricultural character is contested under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal Case Name: Harpal Singh vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NO. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Land Dispute: Harpal Singh vs. Ashok Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Freezing of Bank Accounts in Gujarat Riot Funds Case: Teesta Setalvad & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat (2017) INSC 1069 (15 December 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: The central legal issue is the extent of the power of police officers to seize bank accounts under Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, particularly when those accounts are suspected to be linked to a crime. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Teesta Atul Setalvad vs. The State of Gujarat. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Freezing of Bank Accounts in Gujarat Riot Funds Case: Teesta Setalvad & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat (2017) INSC 1069 (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns contributory negligence finding in motor accident case: Dinesh Kumar vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a claimant’s failure to produce a driving license automatically implies contributory negligence in a motor accident case. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Sri Dinesh Kumar. J @ Dinesh J vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd & Ors. Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation:

Supreme Court overturns contributory negligence finding in motor accident case: Dinesh Kumar vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Imposing Major Penalties in Bank Service Rules: State Bank of India vs. B.R. Saini (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second show-cause notice is required before imposing a major penalty on a bank employee after the disciplinary authority has already provided the inquiry report and an opportunity to respond. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs. B.R. Saini Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Date of

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Imposing Major Penalties in Bank Service Rules: State Bank of India vs. B.R. Saini (2017) Read Post »

Aadhaar Linking Deadline Extended: Supreme Court Grants Relief in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India (15 December 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Extension of deadlines for Aadhaar linking to various services and schemes. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India Judgment Date: 15 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1104 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A. K. Sikri, J, A.M. Khanwilkar, J,

Aadhaar Linking Deadline Extended: Supreme Court Grants Relief in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Central Government’s Power to Prohibit Drugs Upheld: Supreme Court Interprets Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (15 December 2017)

Can the Central Government ban a drug without consulting the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB)? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question regarding the interpretation of Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. This case examines the extent of the Central Government’s power to regulate drugs in the interest of

Central Government’s Power to Prohibit Drugs Upheld: Supreme Court Interprets Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (15 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Tractor Accident Victim: Halappa vs. Malik Sab (2017)

Can an insurance company deny a claim for compensation if the injured person was not a passenger in the vehicle? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case regarding a tractor accident. The court had to determine if the High Court was correct in reversing the compensation awarded by the Motor

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Tractor Accident Victim: Halappa vs. Malik Sab (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Property Dispute: Raj Kumar Bhatia vs. Subhash Chander Bhatia (2017) INSC 754

Date of the Judgment: December 15, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 754 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A. M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr D Y Chandrachud, J Can a party amend their written statement to include a new defense, even if it is years after the initial filing? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Property Dispute: Raj Kumar Bhatia vs. Subhash Chander Bhatia (2017) INSC 754 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Possession: Sunkamma vs. S. Pushparaj (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a permanent injunction can be granted based on possession of property supported by a General Power of Attorney, even without a registered sale deed. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law) Case Name: Sunkamma (D) by LRs. vs. S. Pushparaj (D) by LRs. Judgment Date: 14 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 December

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Possession: Sunkamma vs. S. Pushparaj (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Mining Cap in Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of mining production caps. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to environmental and mining regulation. Case Name: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 December 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1037 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Abhay Manohar

Supreme Court Modifies Mining Cap in Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Trademark Dispute: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of ‘Royal Orchid’ Registration in Class 42: Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. vs. Kamat Hotels (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the trademark ‘Royal Orchid’ can be registered in Class 42, concerning hotel services, given a prior registration of ‘Orchid’ in the same class by another party. CASE TYPE: Intellectual Property (Trademark) Case Name: Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. vs. Kamat Hotels (India) Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 14 December 2017 Introduction Date of

Trademark Dispute: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of ‘Royal Orchid’ Registration in Class 42: Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. vs. Kamat Hotels (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Convictions in Deadly Mob Attack Case: Joseph vs. State (2017) INSC 1094

LEGAL ISSUE: Vicarious liability of members of an unlawful assembly for the acts of other members. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Joseph vs. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1094 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., R. Banumathi, J. (authored the

Supreme Court Modifies Convictions in Deadly Mob Attack Case: Joseph vs. State (2017) INSC 1094 Read Post »

Scroll to Top