Author name: G.R. Hari

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of A.P. vs. P. Satyanarayana Murthy (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: [INSC Citation to be added when available] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a High Court overturn a trial court’s conviction based on a differing view of evidence when a public servant is caught red-handed accepting a bribe? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of A.P. vs. P. Satyanarayana Murthy (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for age determination of juvenile offenders in criminal cases: Babloo Pasi vs. State of Jharkhand (2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., D.K. Jain, J. When an accused claims to be a juvenile, how should courts determine their age? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in Babloo Pasi vs. State of Jharkhand. The case clarifies the procedure for determining the

Supreme Court settles procedure for age determination of juvenile offenders in criminal cases: Babloo Pasi vs. State of Jharkhand (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows release of properties in full settlement of dues: C.R. Patil vs. State of Gujarat (2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., D. K. Jain, J. The Supreme Court addressed the issue of releasing properties attached as collateral after a full and final settlement (One Time Settlement – OTS) had been reached and honored by the appellant. This case examines the implications of such settlements on

Supreme Court allows release of properties in full settlement of dues: C.R. Patil vs. State of Gujarat (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of power to arrest under Customs Act, 1962: Union of India vs. Padam Narain Aggarwal (October 3, 2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., D.K. Jain, J. Can customs officials arrest someone without prior notice if they suspect a non-bailable offense? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case concerning the extent of powers under the Customs Act, 1962. This judgment clarifies the safeguards and limitations

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of power to arrest under Customs Act, 1962: Union of India vs. Padam Narain Aggarwal (October 3, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 03, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4445 of 2006 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Does a part-time employee qualify as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling them to protection against unlawful retrenchment? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Div.

Supreme Court settles the status of part-time employees under Section 2(s) and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act: Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs. A. Sankaralingam (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Unfair Trade Practice” under MRTP Act: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Case (October 3, 2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 815-816 of 2002 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. What constitutes an unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP Act)? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and a

Supreme Court clarifies “Unfair Trade Practice” under MRTP Act: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Case (October 3, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Judges: Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J., R.V. Raveendran J. Does a delay in seeking a promotion nullify a legitimate claim under statutory service rules? The Supreme Court in Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan examined appeals against a Delhi High Court order concerning the promotion of Lower

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order on framing of charges in Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust case: Sanghi Brothers vs. Sanjay Choudhary (2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1578 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1339 of 2007) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. The Supreme Court addressed the question of whether the High Court was correct in interfering with the trial court’s order to frame charges

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order on framing of charges in Cheating and Criminal Breach of Trust case: Sanghi Brothers vs. Sanjay Choudhary (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the admissibility of defence material during charge framing: Rukmini Narvekar vs. Vijaya Satardekar (2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1576-1577 OF 2008 Judges: Markandey Katju, J. and Altamas Kabir, J. Can a court consider defence materials while framing charges in a criminal case? The Supreme Court addressed this crucial question in Rukmini Narvekar vs. Vijaya Satardekar, a case involving allegations of fraud and misrepresentation

Supreme Court clarifies the admissibility of defence material during charge framing: Rukmini Narvekar vs. Vijaya Satardekar (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Technical Member Absence in IPAB for Patent Dispute: Natco Pharma Ltd. vs. Union of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 01, 2008 The Supreme Court of India stepped in to address a unique problem: what happens when the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), which is supposed to handle complex patent disputes, doesn’t have a Technical Member? This issue arose in a case involving Natco Pharma Limited and the Union

Supreme Court Addresses Technical Member Absence in IPAB for Patent Dispute: Natco Pharma Ltd. vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability for Provident Fund dues between Holding and Subsidiary Companies: Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a holding company be held responsible for the Provident Fund dues of its subsidiary? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case between the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. The court clarified that a subsidiary

Supreme Court clarifies liability for Provident Fund dues between Holding and Subsidiary Companies: Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. ABS Spinning Orissa Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles procedure for demolition orders by Municipal Corporations: Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana vs. Inderjit Singh (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a municipal corporation demolish a construction without proper notice and opportunity for a hearing? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana vs. Inderjit Singh, concerning the legality of demolition orders issued by

Supreme Court settles procedure for demolition orders by Municipal Corporations: Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana vs. Inderjit Singh (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top