Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Article 14, Constitution of India, Article 18, Constitution of India, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Legal Profession, Navin Sinha, Order IV, Supreme Court Rules 2013, Ranjan Gogoi, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Rule 2, Supreme Court Rules 2013, Section 16, Advocates Act, 1961, Senior Advocate Designation, Supreme Court Rules

Can the process of designating Senior Advocates be made more objective and transparent? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India, a landmark judgment that has reshaped the criteria and procedure for designating Senior Advocates. This case, decided on October 12, 2017, not only examined the […]

Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017) Read Post »