Occupancy Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Thota Sridhar Reddy vs. Mandala Ramulamma (2021)

/ Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 with Section 33, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 with Section 7, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 with Section 19, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 with Section 38-E, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Occupancy Rights, Protected Tenant Rights, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Thota Sridhar Reddy vs. Mandala Ramulamma (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a protected tenant’s ownership rights under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, can be nullified by a subsequent grant of occupancy rights under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955. CASE TYPE: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights: Thota Sridhar Reddy vs. Mandala Ramulamma (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds University’s Land Rights: University of Mysore Wins Against Claims of Occupancy (23 March 2018)

/ Judges, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 107, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 44(1), N.V. Ramana, Occupancy Rights, S. Abdul Nazeer

University of Mysore vs. Rajaiah: Supreme Court Upholds University’s Land Rights Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 239 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J. and S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a University be deprived of its land based on claims of occupancy rights by individuals? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court Upholds University’s Land Rights: University of Mysore Wins Against Claims of Occupancy (23 March 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sham Transaction Finding in Land Ceiling Case: Yashchandra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (20 September 2017)

/ Deepak Gupta, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960, Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 4, Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 7, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 with Section 169, Occupancy Rights

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lease deed, not registered and lacking attesting witnesses, can be considered valid for claiming occupancy rights under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, especially when the transaction appears to be a sham to circumvent land ceiling laws. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling/Revenue Law Case Name: Yashchandra (D) By Lrs. vs. The

Supreme Court Upholds Sham Transaction Finding in Land Ceiling Case: Yashchandra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (20 September 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top