Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration in Trademark Dispute: K. Mangayarkarasi vs. N.J. Sundaresan (2025)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 8, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, R. Mahadevan, Trademark Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Arbitrability of disputes involving trademark rights arising from contractual agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Trademark Law. Case Name: K. Mangayarkarasi & Anr. vs. N.J. Sundaresan & Anr. [Judgment Date]: May 9, 2025 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 9, 2025 The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the question of whether a dispute […]

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration in Trademark Dispute: K. Mangayarkarasi vs. N.J. Sundaresan (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after full and final discharge voucher: Arabian Exports vs. National Insurance (2025)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63, Judges, Ujjal Bhuyan

Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 06, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 630 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can an insurance company deny arbitration after the insured has signed a full and final discharge voucher? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Arabian Exports Private Limited

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after full and final discharge voucher: Arabian Exports vs. National Insurance (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles the Extent of Courts’ Power to Modify Arbitral Awards under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Gayatri Balasamy vs. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (30 April 2025)

/ Arbitral Awards, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Arbitration Law, Augustine George Masih, B.R. Gavai, Judges, Judicial Intervention, K.V. Viswanathan, Sanjay Kumar, Sanjiv Khanna

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 30, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 605 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, CJI; B.R. Gavai, J.; Sanjay Kumar, J.; Augustine George Masih, J.; K.V. Viswanathan, J. (authored a separate judgment) Can Indian courts modify an arbitral award, or are they limited to setting it aside? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Settles the Extent of Courts’ Power to Modify Arbitral Awards under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Gayatri Balasamy vs. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (30 April 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside Contempt Order: Rajan Chadha & Anr. vs. Sanjay Arora (2025)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 17, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Augustine George Masih, B.R. Gavai, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 14, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9, Judges

“`html Date of the Judgment: April 23, 2025 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Augustine George Masih, J. The Supreme Court addressed the correctness of procedure adopted by the learned Single Judge of the High Court while passing the impugned judgment and order. This case revolves around a contempt petition filed by

Supreme Court sets aside Contempt Order: Rajan Chadha & Anr. vs. Sanjay Arora (2025) Read Post »

Breach of Contract Affirmed, Compensation Modified: Supreme Court’s Verdict in Larsen and Toubro Limited vs. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Contract Act, Contract Act with Section 16, Contract Act with Section 73, Judges, Pankaj Mithal

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 21, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 523 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. In complex real estate disputes, determining the extent of liability and appropriate compensation can be challenging. The Supreme Court of India recently addressed such a case, focusing on a breach of contract between Larsen and

Breach of Contract Affirmed, Compensation Modified: Supreme Court’s Verdict in Larsen and Toubro Limited vs. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the enforceability of arbitral awards post-resolution plan approval under IBC: Electrosteel Steel Limited vs. Ispat Carrier Private Limited (2025) INSC 525 (21 April 2025)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 31, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 7, Judges, Ujjal Bhuyan

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 April 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 525 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. The Supreme Court addressed a critical question regarding the enforceability of arbitral awards when a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been approved. This case, Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S

Supreme Court settles the enforceability of arbitral awards post-resolution plan approval under IBC: Electrosteel Steel Limited vs. Ispat Carrier Private Limited (2025) INSC 525 (21 April 2025) Read Post »

Scroll to Top