Appointment of Arbitrator

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 8, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9, Scope of Judicial Interference

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11 of Arbitration Act in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of interference by a referral court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Goqii Technologies Private Limited vs. Sokrati Technologies Private Limited Judgment Date: 7th November […]

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 15, Arbitration Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Appointment of a new arbitrator due to the death of the previously appointed arbitrator. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: Sunil Jain (D) Thr. LRs. and Anr. vs. Chandra Kala & Anr. Judgment Date: 19 October 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Hima Kohli, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 2, Judges, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Article 5, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Section 34, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration agreement within an unstamped or insufficiently stamped contract is valid and enforceable. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 25 January

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority Post-Retirement in Construction Dispute (20 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 4, Judges, M.R. Shah, Termination of Arbitrator

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority Post-Retirement in Construction Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator’s mandate terminates upon retirement if the arbitration clause doesn’t explicitly state so. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s Laxmi Continental Construction Co. vs. State of U.P. & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 20 September 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 September

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority Post-Retirement in Construction Dispute (20 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Contract Law, General Conditions of Contract, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court on Appointment of Arbitrators in Railway Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an independent arbitrator can be appointed by the High Court when the contract specifies a panel of arbitrators. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV)

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019) Read Post »

Appointment of Sole Arbitrator: Supreme Court Resolves Arbitration Dispute in M/S. Shaf Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. vs. Doordarshan (2019)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration Law, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Dispute Between M/S. Shaf Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. and Doordarshan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Appointment of an arbitrator in an international commercial arbitration. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/S. Shaf Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. vs. Doordarshan – A Constituent of Prasar Bharti & Anr. Judgment Date: 7 November 2019 Introduction Date of

Appointment of Sole Arbitrator: Supreme Court Resolves Arbitration Dispute in M/S. Shaf Broadcast Pvt. Ltd. vs. Doordarshan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in appointment of arbitrators: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (05 September 2019)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Judges, Judicial Intervention in Arbitration, R. Subhash Reddy, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11(6A) of Arbitration Act: Mayavti Trading vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (2019) Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2019 Citation: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman, Civil Appeal No.7023 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 8519 of 2019) Judges: Rohinton Fali Nariman, J., R. Subhash

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in appointment of arbitrators: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (05 September 2019) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Invoked: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Between Nirmal Software and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Nirmal Software Services vs. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute arising from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) containing an arbitration clause should be referred to arbitration. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Nirmal Software Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University & Ors. [Judgment

Arbitration Clause Invoked: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Between Nirmal Software and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Agency Agreement, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(9), Arbitration Law, Contract Law, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. Can a party compel another to arbitration when a dispute arises from a commercial agreement? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(f), Contract Interpretation, Contract Law, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: IBI Consultancy India Private Limited vs. DSC Limited [Judgment Date]: April 16, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 16, 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court: Ineligible Arbitrator Cannot Nominate Successor in Arbitration Cases (03 July 2017)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Dipak Misra, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an individual disqualified from acting as an arbitrator can nominate another arbitrator. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: TRF Ltd. vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. Judgment Date: 03 July 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 03 July 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5306 of 2017 (@ S.L.P. (C) NO. 22912 OF 2016)

Supreme Court: Ineligible Arbitrator Cannot Nominate Successor in Arbitration Cases (03 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top