Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Termination, Hima Kohli, Judges, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, Mitigation of Damages, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view on contract interpretation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 33, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Escalation Charges, Fixed Price Clause, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Rebate, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: March 04, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 127 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Surya Kant, J., and Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an arbitrator’s decision on contract interpretation be challenged in court if

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Clause 59 in construction contracts: K. Marappan vs. The Superintending Engineer (27 March 2019)

/ Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 15, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 33, Construction Contracts, Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 70, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Date of the Judgment: 27 March 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 263 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a contractor claim compensation for additional expenses incurred due to unforeseen circumstances during a project, even if the contract has a clause limiting such claims? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Clause 59 in construction contracts: K. Marappan vs. The Superintending Engineer (27 March 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top