Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, Arbitration Law, C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, specifically Section 11(6A), to court proceedings for the appointment of an arbitrator. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. […]

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 with Section 26, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 to court proceedings under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when the arbitration notice was issued before the 2015 amendment but the court application

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in power purchase disputes: MP Power Trading vs. Narmada Equipments (2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, Arbitration Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(f), Electricity Law, Judges, M R Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in power purchase disputes: MP Power Trading vs. Narmada Equipments (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Jurisdiction of State Electricity Commissions in disputes between licensees and generating companies. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Electricity Law Case Name: Chief General Manager (IPC) M P Power Trading Co Ltd & Anr vs. Narmada Equipments Pvt Ltd [Judgment

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in power purchase disputes: MP Power Trading vs. Narmada Equipments (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act on Limitation: Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. (27 November 2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 7, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act on Limitation: Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in rejecting an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the grounds that it was barred by

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act on Limitation: Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. (27 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clauses, Limits Interference: Union of India vs. Parmar Construction Company (2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 26, Contract Law, Contract Law with 'No Claim' Certificates, Contract Law with Arbitration Clause, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clauses, Limits Interference: Union of India vs. Parmar Construction Company (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can appoint an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when the parties have already agreed to a specific procedure for arbitrator appointment in their contract, and whether

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clauses, Limits Interference: Union of India vs. Parmar Construction Company (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top