Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 8, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of interference by a referral court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Goqii Technologies Private Limited vs. Sokrati Technologies Private Limited Judgment Date: […]

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 11 of the Arbitration Act in Goqii Technologies vs. Sokrati Technologies (2024) Read Post »

Seat of Arbitration: Supreme Court Defines the Scope in Cross-Border Disputes (2024) INSC 850 (7 November 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(2), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 20

Supreme Court Clarifies the Seat of Arbitration in International Disputes Date of the Judgment: 7 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 850 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. When parties from different countries agree to resolve disputes through arbitration, where should that arbitration take place? The Supreme Court of India

Seat of Arbitration: Supreme Court Defines the Scope in Cross-Border Disputes (2024) INSC 850 (7 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay between Arbitration Agreements and the Indian Stamp Act: In Re: Interplay between Arbitration Agreements (2023) INSC 1066 (13 December 2023)

/ Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Arbitration Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(g), Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(j), Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 33, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 35

Date of the Judgment: 13 December 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 1066 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul J, B R Gavai J, Surya Kant J, J B Pardiwala J, Manoj Misra J. Can an arbitration agreement be considered invalid if the underlying contract is not properly stamped? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court clarifies the interplay between Arbitration Agreements and the Indian Stamp Act: In Re: Interplay between Arbitration Agreements (2023) INSC 1066 (13 December 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024)

/ Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 63

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a discharge voucher for full and final settlement bars invocation of arbitration. CASE TYPE: Insurance Law, Arbitration Law Case Name: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning Judgment Date: 18th July

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Arbitration After Full and Final Settlement: SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Krish Spinning (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the power of remand in Section 37 Arbitration Act Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37

Supreme Court on Remand in Arbitration Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate court’s power to remand a case under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani [Judgment Date]: July

Supreme Court clarifies the power of remand in Section 37 Arbitration Act Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the limitation period for appointment of arbitrators under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Arif Azim Co. Ltd. vs. Aptech Ltd. (2024)

/ Applicability of Limitation Act to Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 43, Commencement of Arbitral Proceedings, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Arbitrator Appointments in Arif Azim Co. Ltd. vs. Aptech Ltd. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 1st March 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 155 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. When does the clock start ticking for filing an application for the appointment of an arbitrator?

Supreme Court clarifies the limitation period for appointment of arbitrators under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act: Arif Azim Co. Ltd. vs. Aptech Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, Arbitration Law, C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, specifically Section 11(6A), to court proceedings for the appointment of an arbitrator. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Shree Vishnu Constructions vs.

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in appointment of arbitrator: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 with Section 26, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 21, C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 to court proceedings under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when the arbitration notice was issued before the 2015 amendment but the court application

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act: Shree Vishnu Constructions vs. Military Engineering Service (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the enforceability of arbitration agreements in unstamped contracts: N.N. Global Mercantile Private Limited vs. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors. (25 April 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, C.T. Ravikumar, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(g), Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(h), Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 35, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2023 Citation: INSC 368 of 2023 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., Ajay Rastogi, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J., and C.T. Ravikumar, J. (Majority opinion by K.M. Joseph, J. with a concurring opinion by C.T. Ravikumar, J. and dissenting opinions by Ajay Rastogi, J. and Hrishikesh Roy, J.) Can

Supreme Court clarifies the enforceability of arbitration agreements in unstamped contracts: N.N. Global Mercantile Private Limited vs. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors. (25 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Despite Unstamped Agreements: Weatherford vs. Baker Hughes (20 October 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Arbitration Law, Bela M. Trivedi, Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements, Judges, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Payment of Stamp Duty, Separability of Arbitration Agreement, Stamp Duty, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Despite Unstamped Agreements: Weatherford vs. Baker Hughes (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration agreement within an unstamped contract is enforceable. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Weatherford Oil Tool Middle East Limited vs. Baker Hughes Singapore PTE & Other connected matters. Judgment Date: 20 October 2022 Date of the Judgment: 20

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Despite Unstamped Agreements: Weatherford vs. Baker Hughes (20 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrators, Arbitrability of Disputes, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Dispute Resolution, Interpretation of Clauses, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute falls under an arbitration clause or an exception clause within a contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s. EMAAR INDIA LTD. VERSUS TARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP & ANR. [Judgment Date]: 30

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Notified Claims’ in Arbitration: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. NCC Ltd. (20 July 2022)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Interpretation of Contract, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Notified Claims’ in Arbitration: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. NCC Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 20 July 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 614 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a dispute regarding whether a claim qualifies as a ‘Notified Claim’ under a contract be decided by an

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Notified Claims’ in Arbitration: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. NCC Ltd. (20 July 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top