Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrator Appointment in Railway Contracts: Union of India vs. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appointment of Arbitrators, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration Law, Breach of contract, Contract Law, General Conditions of Contract, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrator Appointment in Railway Contracts: Union of India vs. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the correct procedure for appointing arbitrators in disputes arising from railway contracts, especially when the contract specifies the appointment of railway officers as arbitrators. CASE TYPE: This case falls under […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrator Appointment in Railway Contracts: Union of India vs. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in appointment of arbitrators: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (05 September 2019)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Judges, Judicial Intervention in Arbitration, R. Subhash Reddy, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11(6A) of Arbitration Act: Mayavti Trading vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (2019) Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2019 Citation: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman, Civil Appeal No.7023 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 8519 of 2019) Judges: Rohinton Fali Nariman, J., R. Subhash

Supreme Court clarifies the limited scope of Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in appointment of arbitrators: M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pradyuat Deb Burman (05 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration: Reckitt Benckiser vs. Reynders Label Printing (2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 7, Group of Companies Doctrine, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration: Reckitt Benckiser vs. Reynders Label Printing (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement can be impleaded in arbitration proceedings under the “group of companies” doctrine. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited vs. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited

Supreme Court clarifies Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration: Reckitt Benckiser vs. Reynders Label Printing (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies the Effect of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. vs. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (2019)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Impounding of Instruments, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 33, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 34, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies the Effect of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. vs. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The enforceability of an arbitration agreement contained in an unstamped contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. vs. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. [Judgment Date]: April 10,

Supreme Court Clarifies the Effect of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements: Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. vs. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Agency Agreement, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(9), Arbitration Law, Contract Law, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. Can a party compel another to arbitration when a dispute arises from a commercial agreement? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shipping Dispute: Trans Asian Shipping vs. Beacon Shipping (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(f), Contract Interpretation, Contract Law, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: IBI Consultancy India Private Limited vs. DSC Limited [Judgment Date]: April 16, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 16, 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in IBI Consultancy vs. DSC Limited Dispute (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds No-Claim Certificate in Construction Dispute: ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. ANS Constructions Ltd. (7 February 2018)

/ Amitava Roy, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Proceedings, Construction Contract Disputes, Contract Law, Contract Law with Accord and Satisfaction, Contractual Obligations, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds No-Claim Certificate in Construction Dispute: ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. ANS Constructions Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a ‘No Dues Certificate’ issued by a contractor can be invalidated on grounds of duress or coercion, allowing for arbitration of subsequent claims. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Ltd. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds No-Claim Certificate in Construction Dispute: ONGC Mangalore Petrochemicals Ltd. vs. ANS Constructions Ltd. (7 February 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Liquidated Damages in Government Contracts: BSNL vs. Motorola (2008)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 28, Indian Contract Act with Section 74, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Tarun Chatterjee

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5645 of 2008 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 3459 of 2007] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When can a dispute be resolved outside of court-ordered arbitration? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case between Bharat Sanchar

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Liquidated Damages in Government Contracts: BSNL vs. Motorola (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top