Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 13

Arbitrator Fee Disputes: Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Mandate in Chennai Metro Rail vs. Transtonnelstroy (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 13, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 14, Breach of contract, Contract Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrator Fee Disputes: Chennai Metro Rail vs. Transtonnelstroy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tribunal’s unilateral increase of fees, despite objections from one party, terminates its mandate. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Chennai Metro Rail Limited vs. M/S Transtonnelstroy Afcons (JV) & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 19 October 2023 Date of the Judgment: […]

Arbitrator Fee Disputes: Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Mandate in Chennai Metro Rail vs. Transtonnelstroy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator’s Conflict of Interest: Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain & Ors. vs. Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (24 July 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 13, Arbitration Law, Conflict of Interest, Impartiality of Arbitrator, Judges, R. Banumathi, Setting Aside Arbitral Award

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator’s Conflict of Interest: Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain & Ors. vs. Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator’s prior professional relationship with one of the parties constitutes a conflict of interest, warranting the setting aside of the arbitral award. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator’s Conflict of Interest: Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain & Ors. vs. Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (24 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top