Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

/ Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Supervisory Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution in arbitration matters. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles the Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024)

/ Appointment of Arbitrators, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 23, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 28

Supreme Court Clarifies Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment process which allows a party who has an interest in the dispute to unilaterally appoint a sole arbitrator or curate a panel of arbitrators is valid in law. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v.

Supreme Court Settles the Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) Read Post »

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 19, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice, Sanjiv Khanna, Violation of Natural Justice

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Contract Dispute: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral award should be set aside for violating principles of natural justice and not providing sufficient opportunity to present a case. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contract Terms in Ssangyong vs. NHAI Price Adjustment Dispute: Civil Appeal No. 4779 of 2019 (08 May 2019)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 24(3), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Interpretation of Contract, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Contract Terms in Ssangyong vs. NHAI Price Adjustment Dispute Date of the Judgment: 08 May 2019 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4779 of 2019 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Vineet Saran, J. Can a government body unilaterally change a contract’s price adjustment formula? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Ssangyong

Supreme Court Upholds Contract Terms in Ssangyong vs. NHAI Price Adjustment Dispute: Civil Appeal No. 4779 of 2019 (08 May 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top