Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 20

Seat of Arbitration: Supreme Court Defines the Scope in Cross-Border Disputes (2024) INSC 850 (7 November 2024)

Supreme Court Clarifies the Seat of Arbitration in International Disputes Date of the Judgment: 7 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 850 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. When parties from different countries agree to resolve disputes through arbitration, where should that arbitration take place? The Supreme Court of India […]

Seat of Arbitration: Supreme Court Defines the Scope in Cross-Border Disputes (2024) INSC 850 (7 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the jurisdictional seat of arbitration when a new arbitrator is appointed and conducts proceedings at a different location. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: BBR (India) Private Limited vs. S.P. Singla Constructions Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 18

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction in arbitration: Inox Renewables Ltd. wins against Jayesh Electricals Ltd. (13 April 2021)

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Inox Renewables vs. Jayesh Electricals (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the “seat” of arbitration and its impact on court jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Inox Renewables Ltd. vs. Jayesh Electricals Ltd. Judgment Date: 13 April 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 April 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction in arbitration: Inox Renewables Ltd. wins against Jayesh Electricals Ltd. (13 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Seat” of Arbitration Under the Arbitration Act, 1996: BGS SGS SOMA JV vs. NHPC LTD. (2019) INSC 1052 (10 December 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Seat” of Arbitration Under the Arbitration Act, 1996 Date of the Judgment: 10 December 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 1052 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a contractual clause specifying a venue for arbitration proceedings also be considered the “seat” of arbitration, thereby determining which courts have jurisdiction

Supreme Court Clarifies “Seat” of Arbitration Under the Arbitration Act, 1996: BGS SGS SOMA JV vs. NHPC LTD. (2019) INSC 1052 (10 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the significance of ‘Venue’ as ‘Seat’ in Arbitration Agreements: Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. vs. Kamachi Industries Ltd. (25 July 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases: Venue as Seat | 25 July 2019 Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 714 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a designated ‘venue’ of arbitration in an agreement be considered the ‘seat’ of arbitration, thereby conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the courts

Supreme Court clarifies the significance of ‘Venue’ as ‘Seat’ in Arbitration Agreements: Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. vs. Kamachi Industries Ltd. (25 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top