Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e)

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 10, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 21, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Civil Judge (Senior Division) designated as a Commercial Court can hear arbitration matters, given the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Commercial Law Case Name: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa […]

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42, Indira Banerjee, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the appropriate court for initiating arbitration proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly when the arbitration agreement specifies a venue for sittings but not a seat. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the significance of ‘Venue’ as ‘Seat’ in Arbitration Agreements: Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. vs. Kamachi Industries Ltd. (25 July 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 20, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases: Venue as Seat | 25 July 2019 Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 714 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a designated ‘venue’ of arbitration in an agreement be considered the ‘seat’ of arbitration, thereby conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the courts

Supreme Court clarifies the significance of ‘Venue’ as ‘Seat’ in Arbitration Agreements: Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. vs. Kamachi Industries Ltd. (25 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top