Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 32

Supreme Court Clarifies Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under Section 32 of the Arbitration Act: Dani Wooltex Corporation vs. Sheil Properties (2024)

Supreme Court Clarifies Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under Section 32 of the Arbitration Act: Dani Wooltex Corporation vs. Sheil Properties (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can terminate proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to a claimant’s perceived abandonment of their claim. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under Section 32 of the Arbitration Act: Dani Wooltex Corporation vs. Sheil Properties (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Recall Termination Orders in Arbitration Proceedings

September 20, 2017 / A.K. Sikri, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 25, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 32, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Termination of Proceedings

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal has the power to recall its order terminating proceedings under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the claimant’s failure to file a statement of claim. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited vs. Tuff Drilling Private Limited Judgment Date: 20 September

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Recall Termination Orders in Arbitration Proceedings Read Post »