Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34

Supreme Court settles arbitration involving stockbroker, husband, and wife, clarifying jurisdiction and liability: AC Chokshi Share Broker vs. Jatin Pratap Desai (2025) INSC 174 (10 February 2025)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-Laws, 1957, Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-Laws, 1957 with Bye-law 248(a), Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Sandeep Mehta

Date of the Judgment: 10 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 174 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. When a stockbroker initiates arbitration to recover losses from a client’s account, can the client’s spouse be held jointly liable for the debt? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving […]

Supreme Court settles arbitration involving stockbroker, husband, and wife, clarifying jurisdiction and liability: AC Chokshi Share Broker vs. Jatin Pratap Desai (2025) INSC 174 (10 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Contractual Interpretation: Somdatt Builders vs. NHAI (27 January 2025)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Contract Law, Contract Law with General Conditions of Contract (GCC), Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Ujjal Bhuyan

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of contract clauses regarding variations in quantity of work. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Somdatt Builders –NCC – NEC(JV) vs. National Highways Authority of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 27 January 2025 Date of the Judgment: 27 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 113 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan,

Supreme Court Settles Contractual Interpretation: Somdatt Builders vs. NHAI (27 January 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on arbitral awards: International Seaport Dredging vs. Kamarajar Port (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 5

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on arbitral awards: International Seaport Dredging vs. Kamarajar Port (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Conditions for stay on enforcement of arbitral awards for payment of money. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: International Seaport Dredging Pvt Ltd vs. Kamarajar Port Limited [Judgment Date]: 24 October 2024 Date of the Judgment: 24

Supreme Court clarifies conditions for stay on arbitral awards: International Seaport Dredging vs. Kamarajar Port (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Appellate Review in Arbitration Cases: Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S Sanman Rice Mills (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards

Supreme Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Appellate Review in Arbitration Cases: Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S Sanman Rice Mills (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate court’s powers under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited & Anr. vs.

Supreme Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Appellate Review in Arbitration Cases: Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S Sanman Rice Mills (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the power of remand in Section 37 Arbitration Act Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37

Supreme Court on Remand in Arbitration Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate court’s power to remand a case under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani [Judgment Date]: July

Supreme Court clarifies the power of remand in Section 37 Arbitration Act Appeals: Bombay Slum Redevelopment vs. Samir Narain Bhojwani (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award, Emphasizes Limited Court Interference in Arbitration Cases: S.V. Samudram vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 17 (4 January 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award, Emphasizes Limited Court Interference in Arbitration Cases Date of the Judgment: 4th January 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 17 Judges: Abhay S. Oka J., Sanjay Karol J. Can a court modify an arbitrator’s award, or is its role limited to setting aside the award if it finds errors? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award, Emphasizes Limited Court Interference in Arbitration Cases: S.V. Samudram vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 17 (4 January 2024) Read Post »

Loss of Profit Claims: Supreme Court clarifies evidence requirements in Unibros vs. All India Radio (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 73

Supreme Court on Loss of Profit Claims in Contract Delays: Unibros vs. All India Radio (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes sufficient evidence for a claim of loss of profit due to delays in contract execution? CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s Unibros vs. All India Radio [Judgment Date]: 19th October 2023 Date of the

Loss of Profit Claims: Supreme Court clarifies evidence requirements in Unibros vs. All India Radio (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Claim in Insolvency: RPS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Mukul Kumar (2023)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 31, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 60(5)

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Claim in Insolvency: RPS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Mukul Kumar (2023) Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 816 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Can a creditor, who missed the initial deadline, have their claim considered after the resolution plan has been approved

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Belated Claim in Insolvency: RPS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Mukul Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement: Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Goa (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 28, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Contract Law, Contract Law with Fuel Supply Contract, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement: Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Goa (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 448 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J., Sanjay Kumar, J. Can a court interfere with an arbitrator’s decision on a complex commercial contract? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement: Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Goa (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement Dispute: Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Goa (2023) INSC 514

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 28, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Dinesh Maheshwari, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(f), Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 114, Judges, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement Dispute Date of the Judgment: 10 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 514 Judges: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Sanjay Kumar. This was a unanimous decision by a two-judge bench, with the opinion authored by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari. Can an arbitral award be overturned by a court simply

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award on Power Purchase Agreement Dispute: Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Goa (2023) INSC 514 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute: Super Diamond Tools vs. K. Mohan Rao (2 March 2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Dipankar Datta, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 17, Partnership, Partnership Accounts, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral award based on accounts spanning 21 years, with a counter-claim made after a significant delay, is against public policy and can be set aside. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: Super Diamond Tools & Ors. vs. K. Mohan Rao. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute: Super Diamond Tools vs. K. Mohan Rao (2 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 56, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Policy

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can adduce evidence to support a challenge to an arbitral award based on public policy grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Alpine Housing Development

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top