Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdictional issues in arbitration: General Manager East Coast Railway vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (22 July 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42, Arbitration Law, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Issues in Arbitration: General Manager East Coast Railway vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct jurisdiction for arbitration proceedings when prior applications have been filed in a different court. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. vs. Hindustan Construction […]

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdictional issues in arbitration: General Manager East Coast Railway vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (22 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 20, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42, Judges, Place of Arbitration, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the jurisdictional seat of arbitration when a new arbitrator is appointed and conducts proceedings at a different location. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: BBR (India) Private Limited vs. S.P. Singla Constructions Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 18

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Seat of Arbitration: BBR (India) vs. S.P. Singla Constructions (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42, Indira Banerjee, Judges

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the appropriate court for initiating arbitration proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly when the arbitration agreement specifies a venue for sittings but not a seat. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in arbitration cases: Ravi Ranjan Developers vs. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top