Enforcement of Foreign Awards

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 46, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Review Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories Date of the Judgment: 5 July 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 610 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced against individuals or entities not directly party to the arbitration agreement? The Supreme Court of India, in this review […]

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatories in Review Petition: Arun Dev Upadhyaya vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2023) INSC 610 (5 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Foreign Award Against Non-Signatories Under Alter Ego Doctrine: Gemini Bay Transcription Pvt. Ltd. vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2021) INSC 482 (10 August 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 44, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, B.R. Gavai, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Alter Ego Doctrine, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Judges, R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court Upholds Foreign Award Against Non-Signatories Under Alter Ego Doctrine Date of the Judgment: 10 August 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 482 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J and B.R. Gavai, J. The judgment was authored by R.F. Nariman, J. Can a foreign arbitral award be enforced against entities that were not direct signatories to the arbitration

Supreme Court Upholds Foreign Award Against Non-Signatories Under Alter Ego Doctrine: Gemini Bay Transcription Pvt. Ltd. vs. Integrated Sales Service Ltd. (2021) INSC 482 (10 August 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction over foreign arbitral awards: Noy Vallesina Engineering vs. Jindal Drugs Limited (26 November 2020)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Indira Banerjee, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction over Foreign Arbitral Awards: Noy Vallesina Engineering vs. Jindal Drugs Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a foreign arbitral award can be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA vs. Jindal Drugs Limited & Ors. Judgment Date: 26

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction over foreign arbitral awards: Noy Vallesina Engineering vs. Jindal Drugs Limited (26 November 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards in Arbitration Cases: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 47, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Law with Article 15.5, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Production Sharing Contract, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Limitation period for enforcing foreign arbitral awards in India. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited [Judgment Date]: 16 September 2020 Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 728 Judges:

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Enforcing Foreign Awards in Arbitration Cases: Government of India vs. Vedanta Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Two-Tier Arbitration: Centrotrade vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd. (2 June 2020)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Judges, R.F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Two-Tier Arbitration: Centrotrade vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd. (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a foreign award from a second-tier arbitration in a two-tier arbitration agreement is enforceable in India. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS AND METALS INC. vs. HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. Judgment Date: 2 June 2020 Date

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Two-Tier Arbitration: Centrotrade vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd. (2 June 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Commercial Disputes: Vijay Karia vs. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL (2020) INSC 123 (13 February 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 with FEMA, Judges, R.F. Nariman, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vijay Karia vs. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL (2020) INSC 123 LEGAL ISSUE: Enforceability of foreign arbitral awards in India. CASE TYPE: International Commercial Arbitration Case Name: Vijay Karia & Ors. vs. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 February 2020 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Commercial Disputes: Vijay Karia vs. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL (2020) INSC 123 (13 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (20 February 2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 28, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards in LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Enforceability of foreign arbitral awards and the scope of objections under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Foreign Arbitral Awards: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Contract Disputes: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (20 February 2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 48, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, GAFTA 125, GAFTA 48, Judges, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Enforceability of foreign arbitral awards. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. Judgment Date: 20 February 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 February 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 147

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Contract Disputes: LMJ International Ltd. vs. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. (20 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Despite Initial Document Deficiency: PEC Ltd. vs. Austbulk Shipping (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 47, Enforcement of Foreign Awards, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Despite Initial Document Deficiency: PEC Ltd. vs. Austbulk Shipping (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an application for enforcement of a foreign arbitral award can be dismissed for not including the original arbitration agreement at the time of filing. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: P.E.C. Limited vs. Austbulk Shipping

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Despite Initial Document Deficiency: PEC Ltd. vs. Austbulk Shipping (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top