Interest in Arbitration

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrator’s discretion in awarding post-award interest: Morgan Securities vs. Videocon Industries (2022)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(7), AS Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Interest in Arbitration, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrator’s Power on Post-Award Interest in Morgan Securities vs. Videocon Industries (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of arbitrator’s discretion to award post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Morgan Securities And Credits Pvt. Ltd. vs. Videocon Industries Ltd. Judgment Date: 01 September […]

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrator’s discretion in awarding post-award interest: Morgan Securities vs. Videocon Industries (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “sum” under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Proceedings, B.R. Gavai, Breach of contract, Concession Agreement, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Interest in Arbitration, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Section 31, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro vs. Delhi Metro Rail (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the “sum” awarded under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 includes interest pendente lite. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited vs. Delhi Metro

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “sum” under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Arbitrator’s Power to Award Interest When Contract Prohibits: Union of India vs. Manraj Enterprises (2021)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(7)(a), Arbitration Law, B.V. Nagarathna, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 16(2), General Conditions of Contract, Interest in Arbitration, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Restricts Arbitrator’s Power to Award Interest When Contract Prohibits: Union of India vs. Manraj Enterprises (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can award pendente lite and future interest when the contract between the parties expressly bars it. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India vs. Manraj Enterprises [Judgment Date]: 18 November

Supreme Court Restricts Arbitrator’s Power to Award Interest When Contract Prohibits: Union of India vs. Manraj Enterprises (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top