Interim Measures

Supreme Court overturns High Court order in property theft case: Ruchir Rastogi vs. Pankaj Rastogi (2023)

Supreme Court overturns High Court order in property theft case: Ruchir Rastogi vs. Pankaj Rastogi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in quashing the FIR for offences under Sections 457, 380, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ruchir Rastogi vs. Pankaj Rastogi and Others Judgment […]

Supreme Court overturns High Court order in property theft case: Ruchir Rastogi vs. Pankaj Rastogi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Interim Rent Deposit: Evergreen Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. vs. John Tinson & Company Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Interim Rent Deposit: Evergreen Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. vs. John Tinson & Company Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can order a lessee to deposit the full rental amount as an interim measure under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when the lessee

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Interim Rent Deposit: Evergreen Land Mark Pvt. Ltd. vs. John Tinson & Company Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022)

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Delhi High Court’s orders enforcing an Emergency Arbitrator’s award were valid, and whether the High Court followed principles of natural justice. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Future Coupons Private Limited & Ors. vs. Amazon.com NV

Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court orders in Amazon-Future dispute: Future Coupons vs. Amazon (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “entertain” under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration Act in interim relief cases: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (14 September 2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Entertain” in Section 9(3) of Arbitration Act: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (2021) Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 628 Judges: Indira Banerjee, J., J. K. Maheshwari, J. Can a court continue to hear an application for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “entertain” under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration Act in interim relief cases: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (14 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Post-Award Application in Arbitration Case (30 November 2018)

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Post-Award Application in Arbitration Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass an order on a post-award application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the expiry of the limitation period for challenging the award under Section 34 of the same Act.

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Post-Award Application in Arbitration Case (30 November 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies powers of Arbitral Tribunal to enforce interim orders: Alka Chandewar vs Shamshul Ishrar Khan (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Arbitral Tribunal’s interim orders are enforceable and whether contempt of such orders falls under the ambit of Section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Alka Chandewar vs. Shamshul Ishrar Khan. Judgment Date: July 6, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: July 6, 2017

Supreme Court clarifies powers of Arbitral Tribunal to enforce interim orders: Alka Chandewar vs Shamshul Ishrar Khan (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top