Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited. Judgment Date: January 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022. Citation: (2022) […]

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022)

/ Appellate Review, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: The scope of appellate review under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited [Judgment Date]: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: January

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Ltd. vs. Kandhari Beverages Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Wins Against Kandhari Beverages in Contract Dispute (January 11, 2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Section 37, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award in Haryana Tourism vs. Kandhari Beverages Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Haryana Tourism Limited vs. M/s Kandhari Beverages Limited. Judgment Date: January 11, 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: January 11, 2022.

Supreme Court Restores Arbitrator’s Award: Haryana Tourism Wins Against Kandhari Beverages in Contract Dispute (January 11, 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 31(7)(a), Arbitration Law with Section 34, Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Hima Kohli, Judges, Merger of Agreements, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award compound interest and whether a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) merges into an Implementation Agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(7)(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Arbitration Law, Compound Interest in Arbitration, Hima Kohli, Judges, Merger of Agreements, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award compound interest and whether a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) merges into an Implementation Agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022) Date of the Judgment: 04 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka. The judgment was authored by Justice Ajay Rastogi. Can a party, after filing an arbitration

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Due to Appellant’s Inaction: Durga Welding Works vs. Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal Composition: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12(5), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Seventh Schedule, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Judges, Judicial Review, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 04, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 14 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can an arbitral tribunal composed of officers of one of the disputing parties be considered valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal Composition: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Declares Government Employee Arbitrators Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Seventh Schedule, Arbitrator's Impartiality, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Declares Government Employee Arbitrators Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether government employees can act as arbitrators in disputes involving the government, considering amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Ellora Paper Mills Limited vs. The

Supreme Court Declares Government Employee Arbitrators Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12(5), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Seventh Schedule, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal consisting of employees of one party is valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically considering amendments regarding arbitrator neutrality. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Ellora Paper Mills Limited vs. The State of

Supreme Court Invalidates Arbitral Tribunal: Ellora Paper Mills vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Patent Illegality in Arbitral Award, R. Subhash Reddy, Remission of Arbitral Award

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration Act in I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of court’s power to remit an arbitral award to the tribunal under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: I-Pay Clearing Services Private Limited vs.

Supreme Court clarifies scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award Remission: I-Pay vs. ICICI Bank (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration Law, Curable Defects, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Patent Illegality, R. Subhash Reddy, Remission of Arbitral Award

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award Remission: I-Pay vs. ICICI Bank (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can remit an arbitral award to the tribunal under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, when there is a lack of a finding on a key issue, or only when there are

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Arbitration Award Remission: I-Pay vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Recourse Against Arbitral Award

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration Act in I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 3, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a court send an arbitration award back to the arbitrator for clarification if the award

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top