Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Composite Transactions, Contract Law, Group of Companies Doctrine, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute Date of the Judgment: September 9, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 670 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement be compelled to participate in arbitration proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed […]

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 (Bhutan), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 versus Bhutan’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 in a contract with a clause specifying Indian law as a guide. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Punatsangchhu – 1

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award in Construction Contract Dispute: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh (2017)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can re-appreciate evidence to overturn an arbitrator’s award. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh [Judgment Date]: December 05, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 05, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1070 Judges: J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ. Can a High

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award in Construction Contract Dispute: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top