Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Composite Transactions, Contract Law, Group of Companies Doctrine, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute Date of the Judgment: September 9, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 670 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement be compelled to participate in arbitration proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed […]

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 (Bhutan), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 versus Bhutan’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 in a contract with a clause specifying Indian law as a guide. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Punatsangchhu – 1

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) Read Post »

Arbitrability of Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Supreme Court Refers Issue to Larger Bench in Vidya Drolia vs. Durga Trading Corporation (28 February 2019)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6A), Determination of Lease, Judges, Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, R.F. Nariman, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 111, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 114, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Landlord-Tenant Disputes Under Transfer of Property Act: Vidya Drolia vs. Durga Trading Corporation (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disputes between a landlord and tenant under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, are arbitrable. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Property Law Case Name: Vidya Drolia & Ors. vs. Durga Trading Corporation Judgment Date:

Arbitrability of Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Supreme Court Refers Issue to Larger Bench in Vidya Drolia vs. Durga Trading Corporation (28 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the procedure for execution of arbitral awards: Sundaram Finance vs. Abdul Samad (15 February 2018)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(e), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36(1), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 42, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI, Rule 6, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 38, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 39, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Clarifies Execution of Arbitration Awards Across India: Sundaram Finance vs. Abdul Samad (2018) Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 124 Judges: J. Chelameswar, Sanjay Kishan Kaul Can an arbitral award be executed directly in a court where the assets are located, or does it need to be first filed

Supreme Court settles the procedure for execution of arbitral awards: Sundaram Finance vs. Abdul Samad (15 February 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award in Construction Contract Dispute: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh (2017)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can re-appreciate evidence to overturn an arbitrator’s award. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh [Judgment Date]: December 05, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 05, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 1070 Judges: J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ. Can a High

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award in Construction Contract Dispute: Sutlej Construction vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the arbitrability of disputes after a full and final discharge voucher: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. (2008)

/ Accord and Satisfaction, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 16, Arbitration Agreement, Coercion, Contract Law, Discharge of Contract, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R.V. Raveendran

Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Citation: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. [2008] INSC 1437 Judges: R.V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can a dispute be referred to arbitration after an insured party has issued a full and final discharge voucher to the insurer? The Supreme Court, in

Supreme Court settles the arbitrability of disputes after a full and final discharge voucher: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top