Arbitration Law with Section 11

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Assigned Contracts: Lifeforce Cryobank vs. Cryoviva Biotech (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Assignment of Contracts, Contract Law, Contract Law with Privity of Contract

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Assigned Contracts: Lifeforce Cryobank vs. Cryoviva Biotech (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration agreement can be assigned along with the main contract, even without explicit consent from all parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Lifeforce Cryobank Sciences Inc. vs. Cryoviva Biotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: […]

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Over Assigned Contracts: Lifeforce Cryobank vs. Cryoviva Biotech (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Contract Law, Contractual Disputes, Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, Lease Agreements, Public Premises Act, 1971

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in disputes arising from lease agreements involving public premises. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Lease Dispute Case Name: Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr. vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles &

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Composite Transactions, Contract Law, Group of Companies Doctrine, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute Date of the Judgment: September 9, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 670 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement be compelled to participate in arbitration proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Hima Kohli, Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Section 2, Judges, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Article 5, Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 with Section 34, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration agreement within an unstamped or insufficiently stamped contract is valid and enforceable. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 25 January

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Dispute: Intercontinental Hotels vs. Waterline Hotels (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC (16 September 2020)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, International Commercial Arbitration, Judges, S. A. Bobde, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct arbitration clause when multiple agreements exist between the same parties for the same transaction. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Balasore Alloys Limited vs. Medima LLC Judgment Date: 16 September 2020 Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2020

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause applicability in Balasore Alloys vs. Medima LLC (16 September 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Contract Law, General Conditions of Contract, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court on Appointment of Arbitrators in Railway Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an independent arbitrator can be appointed by the High Court when the contract specifies a panel of arbitrators. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV)

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clause: Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation vs. Ganesh Containers (2019)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Arbitration Law with Section 12, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Indira Banerjee, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clause: Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation vs. Ganesh Containers (2019) Date of the Judgment: January 23, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 65 Judges: R. Banumathi, J. and Indira Banerjee, J. Can a party bypass a pre-agreed arbitration clause and seek the appointment of an independent arbitrator? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Arbitration Clause: Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation vs. Ganesh Containers (2019) Read Post »

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6A), Contract Law, Contract Law with Incorporation by Reference, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Memorandum of Understanding, R. Banumathi

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a single arbitral tribunal can be constituted for multiple contracts arising from the same project, or if separate tribunals are required for each contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. M/s. Gangavaram Port Limited Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top