Arbitration Law with Section 11(6)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Optional” Arbitration Clauses in Partnership Deeds: Tarun Dhameja vs. Sunil Dhameja (2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Disputes in Partnership, Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses, Partnership Deed, Partnership Law

Supreme Court Clarifies “Optional” Arbitration Clauses in Partnership Deeds: Tarun Dhameja vs. Sunil Dhameja (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of arbitration clauses in partnership deeds, specifically the meaning of “optional” arbitration. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Tarun Dhameja vs. Sunil Dhameja & Anr. Judgment Date: 06 December 2024 Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2024 […]

Supreme Court Clarifies “Optional” Arbitration Clauses in Partnership Deeds: Tarun Dhameja vs. Sunil Dhameja (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 21, Arbitration Law with Section 43, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 55, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can reject an arbitration petition at the referral stage if the claim is ex-facie barred by limitation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Elfit Arabia & Anr vs. Concept Hotel

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dispute Resolution, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Settlement Agreement

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute is arbitrable after a settlement agreement has been executed and acted upon by the parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: NTPC LTD. vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD. Judgment Date: 10 April 2023 Date of

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration appeal due to limitation: Vishram Varu & Co. vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 137, M.R. Shah, Stale Claims, Time-barred claims

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration appeal due to limitation: Vishram Varu & Co. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable when the arbitration clause is invoked after a significant delay. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Vishram Varu & Co.

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration appeal due to limitation: Vishram Varu & Co. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 (Bhutan), Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Indu Malhotra, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 versus Bhutan’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2013 in a contract with a clause specifying Indian law as a guide. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: Punatsangchhu – 1

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Law Applicability in Cross-Border Contract Dispute: Punatsangchhu Hydroelectric Project vs. Larsen & Toubro (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Departmental Arbitrator Appointment in Construction Contract Dispute: SP Singla Constructions vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 26, Construction Contracts, Contract Law, Indira Banerjee, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Departmental Arbitrator Appointment in Construction Contract Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a departmental employee can be appointed as an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in a contract, and whether the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to arbitral proceedings commenced before the amendment. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case

Supreme Court Upholds Departmental Arbitrator Appointment in Construction Contract Dispute: SP Singla Constructions vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 37, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 19, Judges, R. Banumathi

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing an arbitration appeal without proper consideration of facts and legal grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: The Navnirman Development Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Divisional Commissioner & President District Sports Complex Executive Committee [Judgment Date]: July 05, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 05,

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top