Arbitration Law with Section 12(5)

Supreme Court Settles the Law on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (2024) INSC 857 (08 November 2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Arbitration Law with Section 18, Arbitrator Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Contract Law, Contract Law with Section 23

Supreme Court Clarifies Independence of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts (2024) INSC 857 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration clause allowing one party to unilaterally appoint an arbitrator is valid. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Public-Private Contracts CASE NAME: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) [Judgment Date]: 08 November 2024 […]

Supreme Court Settles the Law on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators in Public-Private Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (2024) INSC 857 (08 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Invalidates Clause for Government Employee Arbitrator: Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 299, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Invalidates Clause for Government Employee Arbitrator: Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee can be appointed as an arbitrator in a dispute involving the government, given conflict of interest concerns. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/S GLOCK ASIA -PACIFIC LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Invalidates Clause for Government Employee Arbitrator: Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Arbitration Law with Section 12(5), Contract Law, General Conditions of Contract, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court on Appointment of Arbitrators in Railway Contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an independent arbitrator can be appointed by the High Court when the contract specifies a panel of arbitrators. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV)

Supreme Court clarifies appointment of arbitrators in railway contracts: Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) (17 December 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top