Arbitration Law with Section 37

Supreme Court Upholds Clause Barring Damages in Construction Contract: C & C Constructions vs. IRCON International (2025)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Arbitration Law with Section 37, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 23, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 28, Judges, Ujjal Bhuyan

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a clause in a construction contract can validly bar a contractor from claiming damages for delays caused by the employer. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. vs. IRCON International Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 31 January 2025 Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 138 […]

Supreme Court Upholds Clause Barring Damages in Construction Contract: C & C Constructions vs. IRCON International (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership Contract: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S. Sathyanarayana Service Station (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Arbitration Law with Section 37, B.V. Nagarathna, Contract Law, Contract Law with Section 5, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Termination of Contract

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership Contract: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S. Sathyanarayana Service Station (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dealership agreement can be terminated by either party by giving a three-month notice, and if such termination requires acceptance by the other party. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Arbitration Law. Case Name: Indian Oil Corporation

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Dealership Contract: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. M/S. Sathyanarayana Service Station (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Arbitrator’s Power to Award Claims Beyond Final Bill: Union of India vs. Bharat Enterprise (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 16, Arbitration Law with Section 37, B.V. Nagarathna, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clauses 65 and 65A, Final Bill, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Sections 15 to 18, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Krishna Murari, No Claims Certificate

Supreme Court Limits Arbitrator’s Power to Award Claims Beyond Final Bill: Union of India vs. Bharat Enterprise (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can award claims not included in the final bill submitted by a contractor, especially when the contract prohibits such claims. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Limits Arbitrator’s Power to Award Claims Beyond Final Bill: Union of India vs. Bharat Enterprise (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds “Excepted Matter” Clause in Construction Contract: Mitra Guha Builders vs. ONGC (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Arbitration Law with Section 37, Construction Contracts, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 2, Contract Law with Clause 25, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds “Excepted Matter” Clause in Construction Contract: Mitra Guha Builders vs. ONGC (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the levy of pre-estimated liquidated damages by a Superintending Engineer, as per a contract clause, is an arbitrable matter or an “excepted matter.” CASE TYPE: Contract/Arbitration Law Case Name: M/S. MITRA GUHA BUILDERS (INDIA) COMPANY vs. OIL

Supreme Court Upholds “Excepted Matter” Clause in Construction Contract: Mitra Guha Builders vs. ONGC (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Termination Dispute: State of Jharkhand vs. M/s HSS Integrated SDN (2019)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Arbitration Law with Section 37, Arun Mishra, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 2.8 of GCC, Contract Termination, General Conditions of Contract (GCC), Judges, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Termination Dispute: State of Jharkhand vs. M/s HSS Integrated SDN (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the termination of a contract by the State of Jharkhand was legal and in accordance with the terms of the contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: The State of Jharkhand & Ors. vs. M/s

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Termination Dispute: State of Jharkhand vs. M/s HSS Integrated SDN (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 37, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 19, Judges, R. Banumathi

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing an arbitration appeal without proper consideration of facts and legal grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: The Navnirman Development Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Divisional Commissioner & President District Sports Complex Executive Committee [Judgment Date]: July 05, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 05,

Supreme Court Remands Arbitration Appeal for Fresh Hearing: Navnirman Development Consultants vs. Divisional Commissioner (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top