Arbitration Law with Section 43

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 21, Arbitration Law with Section 43, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 55, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can reject an arbitration petition at the referral stage if the claim is ex-facie barred by limitation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Elfit Arabia & Anr vs. Concept Hotel […]

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of Limitation Act and maintainability of counterclaims under MSMED Act: Silpi Industries vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (29 June 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 43, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, MSMED Act with Section 15, MSMED Act with Section 16, MSMED Act with Section 18, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act and Counterclaims in MSMED Act Arbitrations Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29 June 2021 Judges: Ashok Bhushan J. and R. Subhash Reddy J. Can a buyer raise a counterclaim in arbitration proceedings initiated by a supplier under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act)?

Supreme Court settles applicability of Limitation Act and maintainability of counterclaims under MSMED Act: Silpi Industries vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (29 June 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top