Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Currency Conversion in Construction Contracts: Supreme Court clarifies payment terms in National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Law with Agreement dated 29th June 1982, Currency of Payment, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court clarifies currency conversion in construction dispute: National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 899 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can a court order payment in a currency different from what was agreed upon in a contract? The Supreme Court […]

Currency Conversion in Construction Contracts: Supreme Court clarifies payment terms in National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction: Neilan International Co. Ltd. vs. Powerica Limited & Ors. (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 47, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 25, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Territorial Jurisdiction, Transfer Petition

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction Date of the Judgment: July 6, 2022 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can the Supreme Court transfer a case based on a challenge to the territorial jurisdiction of a lower court? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a transfer petition related to an

Supreme Court Refuses to Transfer Arbitration Case Based on Territorial Jurisdiction: Neilan International Co. Ltd. vs. Powerica Limited & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022)

/ Arbitration Law, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna, Special Leave Petition, Supreme Court Procedure, Supreme Court Procedure with Recall of Order

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should recall its order directing a party to deposit an amount as per a High Court order in an arbitration matter. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name:

Supreme Court Refuses to Recall Order on Deposit in Arbitration Case: Dharmesh S. Jain vs. Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019)

/ Arbitration Law, Consumer Law, Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 9, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R. Subhash Reddy, Real Estate Disputes, Tripartite Agreement

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Liability for compensation and refund in a failed real estate project. CASE TYPE: Consumer. Case Name: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 17 December 2019 Date of the Judgment: 17 December

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of 2015 Amendment Act to Arbitration Proceedings: BCCI vs. Kochi Cricket (2018) INSC 227

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 6, Judges, Navin Sinha, R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of 2015 Amendment Act to Arbitration Proceedings: BCCI vs. Kochi Cricket (2018) INSC 227 LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 to pending arbitral and court proceedings. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Board of Control for Cricket in India vs. Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of 2015 Amendment Act to Arbitration Proceedings: BCCI vs. Kochi Cricket (2018) INSC 227 Read Post »

Scroll to Top