Judicial Intervention

Supreme Court Settles the Extent of Courts’ Power to Modify Arbitral Awards under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Gayatri Balasamy vs. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (30 April 2025)

/ Arbitral Awards, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Arbitration Law, Augustine George Masih, B.R. Gavai, Judges, Judicial Intervention, K.V. Viswanathan, Sanjay Kumar, Sanjiv Khanna

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 30, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 605 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, CJI; B.R. Gavai, J.; Sanjay Kumar, J.; Augustine George Masih, J.; K.V. Viswanathan, J. (authored a separate judgment) Can Indian courts modify an arbitral award, or are they limited to setting it aside? The Supreme Court of India addressed this […]

Supreme Court Settles the Extent of Courts’ Power to Modify Arbitral Awards under Sections 34 & 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Gayatri Balasamy vs. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited (30 April 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause: Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. vs. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors. (2023)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 8, Contract Law, Contract Law with Conveyance Deed, Development Agreements, Judicial Intervention, Tripartite Agreements

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration in Property Dispute: Sushma Daga vs. Madhurkumar Bajaj (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute arising from a conveyance deed and development agreements, which are based on prior agreements containing an arbitration clause, can be referred to arbitration, even if the subsequent documents lack such a clause. CASE TYPE: Civil, Arbitration Case

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause: Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. vs. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appeal against Andhra Pradesh High Court stay on SIT probe: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Varla Ramaiah (2023)

/ Corruption Investigation, Executive Powers, Executive Powers with Government Order, Judges, Judicial Intervention, Judicial Review, M. M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Principles of Natural Justice

Supreme Court allows appeal against Andhra Pradesh High Court stay on SIT probe: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Varla Ramaiah (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 03, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 427 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M. M. Sundresh, J. Can a High Court stay a government-initiated investigation into alleged corruption, especially when the

Supreme Court allows appeal against Andhra Pradesh High Court stay on SIT probe: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Varla Ramaiah (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top