Arbitration Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Contract Law, Contractual Disputes, Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, Lease Agreements, Public Premises Act, 1971

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in disputes arising from lease agreements involving public premises. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Lease Dispute Case Name: Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr. vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Post-Award Interest under Arbitration Act: R.P. Garg vs. Telecom Department (2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 31(7)(b), Post-Award Interest

Supreme Court Clarifies Post-Award Interest Under Arbitration Act: R.P. Garg vs. Telecom Department (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether post-award interest on an arbitral award can be denied based on a contractual clause prohibiting interest. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: R.P. Garg vs. The Chief General Manager, Telecom Department & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 September 2024

Supreme Court clarifies Post-Award Interest under Arbitration Act: R.P. Garg vs. Telecom Department (2024) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024)

/ Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Composite Transactions, Contract Law, Group of Companies Doctrine, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute Date of the Judgment: September 9, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 670 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement be compelled to participate in arbitration proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Arbitration Clause Interpretation: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Cox & Kings vs. SAP India Dispute (September 9, 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Arbitration Law with Section 21, Arbitration Law with Section 43, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 55, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can reject an arbitration petition at the referral stage if the claim is ex-facie barred by limitation. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Elfit Arabia & Anr vs. Concept Hotel

Supreme Court dismisses arbitration petition due to limitation: Elfit Arabia vs. Concept Hotel BARONS (2024) INSC 536 (09 July 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the use of “Minutes of Order” in land disputes, emphasizing third-party rights: Ajay Ishwar Ghute & Ors. vs. Meher K. Patel & Ors. (30 April 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 9, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226

Supreme Court on “Minutes of Order” and Third-Party Rights in Land Disputes: Ajay Ishwar Ghute vs. Meher K. Patel (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: The legality of High Court orders based on “Minutes of Order” without considering the rights of third parties. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal (Land Dispute) Case Name: Ajay Ishwar Ghute & Ors. vs. Meher

Supreme Court clarifies the use of “Minutes of Order” in land disputes, emphasizing third-party rights: Ajay Ishwar Ghute & Ors. vs. Meher K. Patel & Ors. (30 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 89

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration award based on an agreement that relies on an ex-parte decree can be enforced after the ex-parte decree is set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: State of

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Arbitration in Land Dispute: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satish Jain (2024) INSC 315 Read Post »

Supreme Court Revokes Arbitral Award in Delhi Metro Case: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (2024)

/ Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Commissioner of Metro Railway Safety, Curative Petition, Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002, Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 with Section 15, Patent Illegality

Supreme Court Revokes Arbitral Award in Delhi Metro Case: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a curative petition can be allowed to correct a miscarriage of justice in an arbitration case, particularly when an arbitral award is found to be patently illegal. CASE TYPE: Arbitration

Supreme Court Revokes Arbitral Award in Delhi Metro Case: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause incorporation in contract law: NBCC vs Zillion Infraprojects (2024)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 7(5), Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Dispute Resolution, Contract Law with Letter of Intent (LOI), Incorporation by reference

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause incorporation in contract law: NBCC vs Zillion Infraprojects (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a general reference to another contract incorporates the arbitration clause from the referenced contract into the main contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: NBCC (India) Limited vs. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 19 March 2024 Date

Supreme Court clarifies arbitration clause incorporation in contract law: NBCC vs Zillion Infraprojects (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies interest liability under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Snehadeep Structures vs. MSSIDC (2024)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Law, Interest on Delayed Payments Act

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Liability under the Interest on Delayed Payments Act: Snehadeep Structures vs. MSSIDC (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, specifically regarding the date from which interest is payable and the applicability of the proviso to Section 3. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court clarifies interest liability under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Snehadeep Structures vs. MSSIDC (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause: Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. vs. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors. (2023)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 8, Contract Law, Contract Law with Conveyance Deed, Development Agreements, Judicial Intervention, Tripartite Agreements

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration in Property Dispute: Sushma Daga vs. Madhurkumar Bajaj (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute arising from a conveyance deed and development agreements, which are based on prior agreements containing an arbitration clause, can be referred to arbitration, even if the subsequent documents lack such a clause. CASE TYPE: Civil, Arbitration Case

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Clause: Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. vs. Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court Defines Scope in Arbitration Cases (2023)

/ Arbitration Act, 1996 with Section 8, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Group of Companies Doctrine, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Contract Principles, Privity of Contract

Supreme Court Clarifies Group of Companies Doctrine in Arbitration Law Date of the Judgment: December 06, 2023 The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment, has clarified the applicability of the “Group of Companies” doctrine in arbitration law. This ruling addresses a critical question: Can a company that hasn’t signed an arbitration agreement be

Group of Companies Doctrine: Supreme Court Defines Scope in Arbitration Cases (2023) Read Post »

Currency Conversion in Construction Contracts: Supreme Court clarifies payment terms in National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Contract Law with Agreement dated 29th June 1982, Currency of Payment, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Interpretation of Contracts

Supreme Court clarifies currency conversion in construction dispute: National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023) Date of the Judgment: October 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 899 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can a court order payment in a currency different from what was agreed upon in a contract? The Supreme Court

Currency Conversion in Construction Contracts: Supreme Court clarifies payment terms in National Projects Construction Corporation vs. Royal Construction Company (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top