Seventh Schedule, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Invalidates Appointment of Government Employee as Arbitrator in Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12(5), Arbitration Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 299, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Impartiality of Arbitrators, Indu Malhotra, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Seventh Schedule, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Invalidates Appointment of Government Employee as Arbitrator in Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee can be appointed as an arbitrator in a dispute where the government is a party, given conflict of interest concerns. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/S GLOCK ASIA-PACIFIC LTD. vs. UNION […]

Supreme Court Invalidates Appointment of Government Employee as Arbitrator in Glock Asia-Pacific vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Due to Ineligibility of Government Official: Haryana Space Application Centre vs. Pan India Consultants (20 January 2021)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12(5), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 29A(6), Indu Malhotra, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Seventh Schedule, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Due to Ineligibility of Government Official: Haryana Space Application Centre vs. Pan India Consultants (2021) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 21 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao J., Indu Malhotra J., Ajay Rastogi J. Can a government official, who is part of the management of a state

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Due to Ineligibility of Government Official: Haryana Space Application Centre vs. Pan India Consultants (20 January 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top