Army Act, 1950 with Section 164

Supreme Court Upholds Cashiering for Misconduct, Clarifies Pension Forfeiture: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. S.S. Bedi (2020)

/ Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 164, Army Act, 1950 with Section 71, Hemant Gupta, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Cashiering for Misconduct, Clarifies Pension Forfeiture: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. S.S. Bedi (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the punishment of cashiering from service automatically leads to forfeiture of pensionary benefits and whether the Armed Forces Tribunal was correct in altering the punishment of cashiering to a fine. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Armed […]

Supreme Court Upholds Cashiering for Misconduct, Clarifies Pension Forfeiture: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. S.S. Bedi (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal Under Army Act: Sanjay Marutirao Patil vs. Union of India (2020)

/ Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 164, Army Act, 1950 with Section 20, Army Act, 1950 with Section 63, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal Under Army Act: Sanjay Marutirao Patil vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an administrative dismissal under Section 20 of the Army Act, 1950, after a Summary Court Martial for the same misconduct, constitutes double jeopardy. CASE TYPE: Armed Forces Law Case Name: Sanjay Marutirao Patil vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal Under Army Act: Sanjay Marutirao Patil vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top