Army Act, 1950 with Section 45

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of Army officer due to irregular Judge Advocate appointment: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora (2024)

/ Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 39(a), Army Act, 1950 with Section 45, Army Act, 1950 with Section 57(c), Court Martial, Judge Advocate, Military Law

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of Army officer due to irregular Judge Advocate appointment: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora (2024) Date of the Judgment: September 09, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 672 Judges: Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale Can a Court Martial’s decision be valid if the Judge Advocate is […]

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of Army officer due to irregular Judge Advocate appointment: Union of India vs. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside General Court Martial Due to Limitation Under Army Act: Col Anil Kumar Gupta vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 30(1), Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 122, Army Act, 1950 with Section 45, Bela M. Trivedi, Judges, Offences, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Sets Aside General Court Martial Due to Limitation Under Army Act: Col Anil Kumar Gupta vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the limitation period for commencing a court-martial under Section 122 of the Army Act, 1950, begins when the aggrieved person has knowledge of the alleged offense or when the authorities

Supreme Court Sets Aside General Court Martial Due to Limitation Under Army Act: Col Anil Kumar Gupta vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top