Army Act, 1950 with Section 52(f)

Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Service Matters: Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Power in Union of India vs. P.S. Gill (27 November 2019)

/ Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 14, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 3(o), Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 123, Army Act, 1950 with Section 52(f), Army Act, 1950 with Section 63, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Service Matters: Union of India vs. P.S. Gill (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of the Armed Forces Tribunal’s jurisdiction over service matters, specifically regarding challenges to the convening of a General Court Martial. CASE TYPE: Armed Forces Law/Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. P.S. Gill Judgment Date: […]

Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Service Matters: Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Power in Union of India vs. P.S. Gill (27 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds General Court Martial Decision in Army Fraud Case: Union of India vs. Rabinder Singh (2011)

/ Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 3(xxv), Army Act, 1950 with Section 52(f), H.L. Gokhale, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 24, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 477A, J.M. Panchal, Judges, Offences in respect of property

Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2011 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 7241 of 2002 Judges: J.M. Panchal and H.L. Gokhale JJ. Can a commanding officer be held liable for fraud if they misuse funds meant for vehicle modifications, even if they don’t personally gain? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Upholds General Court Martial Decision in Army Fraud Case: Union of India vs. Rabinder Singh (2011) Read Post »

Scroll to Top