Army Instructions

Supreme Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria for Technical Equipment Officers in Army Air Defence: Borgoyary vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Appointment of Officers, Army Act, 1950, Army Instructions, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria for Technical Equipment Officers in Army Air Defence: Borgoyary vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the eligibility criteria prescribed by the Adjutant General’s Branch for the post of Technical Equipment Officer (TEO) in the Army Air Defence (AAD) are valid and whether candidates not meeting these criteria can […]

Supreme Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria for Technical Equipment Officers in Army Air Defence: Borgoyary vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018)

/ Armed Forces, Army Instructions, Army Medical Corps, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay and Allowances, Retiral Benefits, Service Law, Study Leave

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Army Medical Corps officer is entitled to pay and allowances for an extended period of study leave, when the extension was sanctioned by the President of India. CASE TYPE: Service

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top