Army Act, 1950

Supreme Court clarifies Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction in Secondment Cases: Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha vs. Union of India (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 with Section 3(o), Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 27, Army Act, 1950 with Section 33, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, Service Matters

Supreme Court clarifies Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction in Secondment Cases (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of “service matters” under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, specifically regarding permanent secondment in organizations like the Directorate General of Quality Assurance (DGQA). CASE TYPE: Service Law, Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction Case Name: Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha vs. Union of […]

Supreme Court clarifies Armed Forces Tribunal Jurisdiction in Secondment Cases: Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha vs. Union of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Fraudulent Enrolment in Army: Ex Sig. Man Kanhaiya Kumar vs. Union of India (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 122, Army Act, 1950 with Section 20, Army Rules, 1954, Ashok Bhushan, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Fraudulent Enrolment in Army: Ex Sig. Man Kanhaiya Kumar vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether dismissal under Section 20(3) of the Army Act, 1950 is valid when a specific provision under Section 122(4) of the same Act exists for fraudulent enrolment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ex

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Fraudulent Enrolment in Army: Ex Sig. Man Kanhaiya Kumar vs. Union of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds General Court Martial Decision in Army Fraud Case: Union of India vs. Rabinder Singh (2011)

/ Army Act, 1950, Army Act, 1950 with Section 3(xxv), Army Act, 1950 with Section 52(f), H.L. Gokhale, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 24, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 477A, J.M. Panchal, Judges, Offences in respect of property

Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2011 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 7241 of 2002 Judges: J.M. Panchal and H.L. Gokhale JJ. Can a commanding officer be held liable for fraud if they misuse funds meant for vehicle modifications, even if they don’t personally gain? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Upholds General Court Martial Decision in Army Fraud Case: Union of India vs. Rabinder Singh (2011) Read Post »

Scroll to Top