Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 6, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 8, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Res Judicata, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior judgment upholding a contract that violates statutory prohibitions operates as res judicata in subsequent proceedings. CASE TYPE: Banking Law, Contract Law, Civil Procedure. Case Name: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata Exceptions in Banking Dispute: Canara Bank vs. N.G. Subbaraya Setty (2018) Read Post »