Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756

Supreme Court on Benami Transactions in HUF Property: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 LEGAL ISSUE: The legal issue in this case is whether a property purchased by the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) in the name of a family member can be considered a benami transaction, and if so, whether it […]

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268

April 2, 2019 / Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Code of Civil Procedure, Fiduciary Capacity, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Order VII Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, Rejection of Plaint, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268 Date of the Judgment: April 02, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 268 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can a plaint be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) if

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268 Read Post »