Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024)

/ Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Transfer of Property Act, Transfer of Property Act with Section 54, Transfer of Property Act with Section 6(h), Transfer of Property Act with Section 7

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 769 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J., Sanjay Kumar, J. Can a claim of adverse possession succeed against a title established through a […]

Supreme Court Upholds Title Based on Registered Sale Deed, Dismissing Adverse Possession Claim: Neelam Gupta & Ors. vs. Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Anr. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756

/ Benami Transaction, Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Hindu Law, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court on Benami Transactions in HUF Property: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 LEGAL ISSUE: The legal issue in this case is whether a property purchased by the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) in the name of a family member can be considered a benami transaction, and if so, whether it

Supreme Court clarifies Benami Transactions within Hindu Undivided Families: Pushpalata vs. Vijay Kumar (2022) INSC 756 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Loan Recovery: Benami Transaction Plea Rejected in Fair Communication Case (20 January 2020)

/ Admissibility of Evidence, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 3, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Evidence Act, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Prohibition of Benami Transactions, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Loan Recovery: Benami Transaction Plea Rejected in Fair Communication Case (20 January 2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plea of benami transaction can be used to avoid repayment of a loan. CASE TYPE: Civil (Loan Recovery). Case Name: M/S Fair Communication and Consultants & Anr. vs. Surendra Kerdile. Judgment Date: 20 January 2020

Supreme Court Upholds Loan Recovery: Benami Transaction Plea Rejected in Fair Communication Case (20 January 2020) Read Post »

Benami Transactions: Supreme Court Rules on Property Ownership in Leelavathi vs. Shankarnarayana Rao (2019)

/ Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 2, Family Property Disputes, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, Ownership Rights, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Property Rights: Leelavathi vs. Shankarnarayana Rao (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether properties purchased with financial assistance from a father in the names of his sons are considered benami transactions. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Law. Case Name: Smt. P. Leelavathi (D) by LRs vs. V. Shankarnarayana Rao (D) by LRs. [Judgment Date]: April 9,

Benami Transactions: Supreme Court Rules on Property Ownership in Leelavathi vs. Shankarnarayana Rao (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268

/ Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Code of Civil Procedure, Fiduciary Capacity, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Order VII Rule 11, Code of Civil Procedure, Rejection of Plaint, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268 Date of the Judgment: April 02, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 268 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can a plaint be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) if

Supreme Court allows appeal against rejection of plaint under Benami Act: Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal (2019) INSC 268 Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on family property rights: Vinod Kumar Dhall vs. Dharampal Dhall (2018) INSC 289

/ Arun Mishra, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 2(a), Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 with Section 4, Family Property, Judges, Property Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rules on Family Property Dispute: Vinod Kumar Dhall vs. Dharampal Dhall (2018) INSC 289 Date of the Judgment: 16th April 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 289 Judges: Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit Can a property acquired in the name of one family member be considered family property, even if other family

Supreme Court rules on family property rights: Vinod Kumar Dhall vs. Dharampal Dhall (2018) INSC 289 Read Post »

Scroll to Top