Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948

Supreme Court clarifies electricity duty on sale to licensee: Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (24 September 2021)

/ Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948, Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 with Section 2(b), Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 with Section 2(ee), Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 with Section 3, BV Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Entry 53, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Legislative Competence, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court clarifies electricity duty on sale to licensee: Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the sale of electricity by a generator to a licensee is subject to electricity duty under the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: M/s Magadh Sugar & Energy […]

Supreme Court clarifies electricity duty on sale to licensee: Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (24 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: State of Jharkhand vs. Brahmputra Metallics Ltd. (2020) INSC 895 (1 December 2020)

/ Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 with Section 9, Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 with Section 9A, Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Legitimate Expectation, Promissory Estoppel

Supreme Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel in Electricity Duty Exemption Case Date of the Judgment: 1 December 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 895 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J, Indu Malhotra, J. Can a state government renege on its policy promises, especially when businesses have relied on them? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical

Supreme Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel in Electricity Duty Exemption Case: State of Jharkhand vs. Brahmputra Metallics Ltd. (2020) INSC 895 (1 December 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top