Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000

Supreme Court settles reservation benefits for employees post-state reorganization: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (26 April 2022)

/ Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 with Section 73, Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 with Section 74, Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 341, Constitutional Law with Article 342, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation Benefits Post-State Reorganization in Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of a bifurcated state are entitled to reservation benefits in the newly formed state for promotions through limited departmental examinations. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission and Ors. Judgment […]

Supreme Court settles reservation benefits for employees post-state reorganization: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (26 April 2022) Read Post »

Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017)

/ Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 with Section 84, Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 with Section 85, D. Y. Chandrachud, Education Regulations, Jagdish Singh Khehar, Judges, N. V. Ramana, Pharmacy Act, 1948, Pharmacy Act, 1948 with Section 30, Pharmacy Act, 1948 with Section 32

Can a newly formed state create a fresh register of pharmacists, or does the existing register of the parent state apply? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in a case concerning the reorganization of states and the registration of pharmacists. This judgment clarifies the legal position of pharmacist registrations after state divisions.

Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top