Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017)

/ Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000, Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 with Section 84, Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 with Section 85, D. Y. Chandrachud, Education Regulations, Jagdish Singh Khehar, Judges, N. V. Ramana, Pharmacy Act, 1948, Pharmacy Act, 1948 with Section 30, Pharmacy Act, 1948 with Section 32

Can a newly formed state create a fresh register of pharmacists, or does the existing register of the parent state apply? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in a case concerning the reorganization of states and the registration of pharmacists. This judgment clarifies the legal position of pharmacist registrations after state divisions. […]

Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017) Read Post »