Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 with Rule 18, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 with Rule 3, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When can a higher court hear an appeal against a lower court’s decision if the original case involved multiple parts of the Indian Constitution? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in the case of Shahu […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008) Read Post »